These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36094977)

  • 1. On the Importance of Consistent Insonation Conditions During Hydrophone Calibration and Use.
    Rajagopal S; Robinson SP; Ablitt J; Miloro P; Wang L; Zeqiri B; Hurrell A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 36094977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration of miniature medical ultrasonic hydrophones for frequencies in the range 100 to 500 kHz using an ultrasonically absorbing waveguide.
    Rajagopal S; Zeqiri B; Gélat PN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 May; 61(5):765-78. PubMed ID: 24803021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Practicalities of Obtaining and Using Hydrophone Calibration Data to Derive Pressure Waveforms.
    Hurrell AM; Rajagopal S
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):126-140. PubMed ID: 27479961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extending the frequency range of the National Physical Laboratory primary standard laser interferometer for hydrophone calibrations to 80 MHz.
    Esward TJ; Robinson SP
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1999; 46(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 18238474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz using time gating frequency analysis and finite amplitude waves.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
    Ultrasonics; 2003 Jun; 41(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 12782255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary reciprocity-based method for calibration of hydrophone magnitude and phase sensitivity: complete tests at frequencies from 1 to 7 MHz.
    Oliveira EG; Costa-Felix RP; Machado JC
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():87-95. PubMed ID: 25578371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic needle hydrophone calibration in air by a parabolic off-axis mirror focused beam using three-transducer reciprocity.
    Svilainis L; Chaziachmetovas A; Kaskonas P; Gomez Alvarez-Arenas TE
    Ultrasonics; 2023 Aug; 133():107025. PubMed ID: 37159982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absolute calibration of hydrophones immersed in sandy sediment.
    Robb GB; Robinson SP; Theobald PD; Hayman G; Humphrey VF; Leighton TG; Wang LS; Dix JK; Best AI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):2918-27. PubMed ID: 19425635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Different Calibration Techniques for Hydrophones Used in Medical Ultrasonic Field Measurement.
    Weber M; Wilkens V
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 May; 68(5):1919-1929. PubMed ID: 33360988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multiple-frequency hydrophone calibration technique.
    Smith RA; Bacon DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2231-43. PubMed ID: 2189922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nominal Versus Actual Spatial Resolution: Comparison of Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size for Membrane, Needle, Capsule, and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones.
    Wear KA; Shah A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 36178990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling of anomalies due to hydrophones in continuous-wave ultrasound fields.
    Huttunen T; Kaipio JP; Hynynen K
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1486-500. PubMed ID: 14682632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 1-60 MHz measurements in focused acoustic fields using spatial averaging corrections.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Nowicki A
    Ultrasonics; 2002 May; 40(1-8):497-501. PubMed ID: 12159990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydrophone spatial averaging corrections from 1 to 40 MHz.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Goldstein A; Nowicki A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Nov; 48(6):1575-80. PubMed ID: 11800120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are hydrophones of diameter 0.5 mm small enough to characterise diagnostic ultrasound equipment?
    Smith RA
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1593-607. PubMed ID: 2685834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.
    Wear KA; Liu Y
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 30530327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissemination of the Acoustic Pascal: The Role and Experiences of a National Metrology Institute.
    Rajagopal S; de Melo Baesso R; Miloro P; Zeqiri B
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 36112557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interlaboratory evaluation of hydrophone sensitivity calibration from 0.1 to 2 MHz via time delay spectrometry.
    Harris GR; Gammell PM; Lewin PA; Radulescu EG
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):349-53. PubMed ID: 15047310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary calibration of hydrophones with extended frequency range 1 to 70 MHz using optical interferometry.
    Koch C; Molkenstruck W
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1999; 46(5):1303-14. PubMed ID: 18244323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.
    Wear KA; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Liu Y; Harris GR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jan; 61(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 24402896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.