106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3609515)
1. Accuracy of a 40 dB HL Audioscope and audiometer screening for adults.
Frank T; Petersen DR
Ear Hear; 1987 Jun; 8(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 3609515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of the Welch Allyn AudioScope and traditional hearing screening for children with known hearing loss.
Gershel J; Kruger B; Giraudi-Perry D; Chobot J; Rosenberg M; Shapiro IM; Diano A; Kopet J; Shelov S
J Pediatr; 1985 Jan; 106(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 3965674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a Computer-Administered Version of the Digits-in-Noise Test for Hearing Screening in the United States.
Folmer RL; Vachhani J; McMillan GP; Watson C; Kidd GR; Feeney MP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28240983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of application-based audiometry for hearing evaluation.
Lee SY; Seo HW; Jung SM; Lee SH; Chung JH
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7359. PubMed ID: 38548854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.
van Dijk C; Osman N
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008; 55():29-36. PubMed ID: 19485067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The AudioScope: a clinical tool for otoscopic and audiometric examination.
Bienvenue GR; Michael PL; Chaffinch JC; Zeigler J
Ear Hear; 1985; 6(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 4054439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-year ear, nose, and throat cross-sectional analysis of audiometric protocols for magnetic resonance imaging screening of acoustic tumors.
Cheng TC; Wareing MJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Mar; 146(3):438-47. PubMed ID: 22075076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Audiometry in general practice: validation of a pragmatic pure-tone audiometry method.
Karlsmose B; Pedersen HB; Lauritzen T; Parving A
Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 9728773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods for screening for hearing loss in older adults.
McBride WS; Mulrow CD; Aguilar C; Tuley MR
Am J Med Sci; 1994 Jan; 307(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 8291505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing screening with portable screening pure-tone audiometer and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Wang YF; Wang SS; Tai CC; Lin LC; Shiao AS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Jun; 65(6):285-92. PubMed ID: 12201570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between hearing threshold measurements made with and without the aid of an ear speculum.
Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P; Bennrup S; Sheppard H
Audiology; 1983; 22(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 6651619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with SVR and PTA in normal hearing subjects].
Liu H; Zhu GY; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Wan L; Fan LH
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 20232737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pure tone audiometry: comparison of general practice and hospital services.
Smith MC; Cable HR; Wilmot JF
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Dec; 38(317):552-5. PubMed ID: 3267745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for hearing impairment in hospitalised elderly.
Lim JK; Yap KB
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Mar; 29(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10895346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing threshold difference between ears and risk of acoustic tumor.
Mangham CA
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Dec; 105(6):814-7. PubMed ID: 1787971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audiometric screening of a population with intellectual disability.
Andersson E; Arlinger S; Magnusson L; Hamrin E
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23110674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
