135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36096096)
1. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.
Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo calculated ionization chamber correction factors in clinical proton beams - deriving uncertainties from published data.
Baumann KS; Gomà C; Wulff J; Kretschmer J; Zink K
Phys Med; 2023 Sep; 113():102655. PubMed ID: 37603909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams.
Khan AU; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 36334024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams.
Gomà C; Hofstetter-Boillat B; Safai S; Vörös S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3207-16. PubMed ID: 25813370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gradient corrections for reference dosimetry using Farmer-type ionization chambers in single-layer scanned proton fields.
Palmans H; Medin J; Trnková P; Vatnitsky S
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6531-6539. PubMed ID: 33111370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT.
Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4.
Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.
Vilches-Freixas G; Bosmans G; Douralis A; Martens J; Meijers A; Rinaldi I; Salvo K; Thomas R; Palmans H; Lourenço A
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(10):. PubMed ID: 38640918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. SU-E-T-146: Reference Dosimetry for Protons and Light-Ion Beams Based on Graphite Calorimetry.
Rossomme S; Palmans H; Thomas R; Lee N; Bailey M; Shipley D; Al-Sulaiti L; Cirrone P; Romano F; Kacperek A; Bertrand D; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3736-3737. PubMed ID: 28517815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo-calculated beam quality and perturbation correction factors validated against experiments for Farmer and Markus type ionization chambers in therapeutic carbon-ion beams.
Urago Y; Sakama M; Sakata D; Fukuda S; Katayose T; Chang W
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(18):. PubMed ID: 37579752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental determination of
Medin J; Andreo P; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy electron beams.
Alissa M; Zink K; Röser A; Flatten V; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
Phys Med; 2024 Jan; 117():103179. PubMed ID: 38042061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors for PTW cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
Giménez-Alventosa V; Giménez V; Ballester F; Vijande J; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(20):205005. PubMed ID: 32434170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
Alissa M; Zink K; Tessier F; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
Phys Med; 2022 Feb; 94():17-23. PubMed ID: 34972070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using PENH.
Gomà C; Sterpin E
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(18):185009. PubMed ID: 31416054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
