189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36097246)
1. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
Oka M; Okada K
Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
Ma W; de la Torre J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
Seo DG; Kim JK
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model.
Yamaguchi K; Okada K
Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):973-995. PubMed ID: 33420895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
de la Torre J; Chiu CY
Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation.
Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():110-130. PubMed ID: 33231301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.
Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Rejoinder.
de la Torre J; Chiu CY
Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):528-529. PubMed ID: 27339703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian DINA Modeling Incorporating Within-Item Characteristic Dependency.
Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao M; Bian Y
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):143-158. PubMed ID: 30792561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
Yu X; Cheng Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
Choi Y; Seo DG
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured.
Akbay L; de la Torre J
Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
