These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36097246)

  • 1. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
    Oka M; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Yamaguchi K; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):973-995. PubMed ID: 33420895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
    de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():110-130. PubMed ID: 33231301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An exploratory Q-matrix estimation method based on sparse non-negative matrix factorization.
    Xiong J; Luo Z; Luo G; Yu X; Li Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Oct; 56(7):7647-7673. PubMed ID: 39060862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Rejoinder.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):528-529. PubMed ID: 27339703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
    Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian DINA Modeling Incorporating Within-Item Characteristic Dependency.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao M; Bian Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):143-158. PubMed ID: 30792561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.