These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36097776)

  • 1. Comparison of diagnostic efficiency between IOTA LR2 model and doctors
    Zhao B; Fu Y; Wen L; Wang Z; Fu C; Liu M
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Aug; 47(8):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 36097776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors.
    Guo Y; Zhao B; Zhou S; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M
    Ultrasonography; 2022 Jul; 41(3):511-518. PubMed ID: 35196832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX model: Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; 64(4):538-549. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
    Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency between the O-RADS US risk stratification system and doctors' subjective judgment.
    Zhou S; Guo Y; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M; Zhao B
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):190. PubMed ID: 37986051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of IOTA three-step strategy and logistic regression model LR2 for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Hidalgo JJ; Llueca A; Zolfaroli I; Veiga N; Ortiz E; Alcázar JL
    Med Ultrason; 2021 May; 23(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33626112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving diagnostic strategies for ovarian cancer in Filipino women using ultrasound imaging and a multivariate index assay.
    Velayo CL; Reforma KN; Sicam RVG; Diwa MH; Sy ADR; Tantengco OAG
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 81():102253. PubMed ID: 36179631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective evaluation of the IOTA logistic regression model LR2 for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Nunes N; Yazbek J; Ambler G; Hoo W; Naftalin J; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 22223587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
    Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
    Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.