124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36097845)
1. Staining-free, Automated Sperm Analysis for In Vitro Fertilization Lab Use.
Dai C; Shan G; Jahangiri S; Chen W; Gholamhoseini B; Zhang Z; Moskovtsev S; Librach C; Jarvi K; Sun Y
J Urol; 2022 Dec; 208(6):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 36097845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated motility and morphology measurement of live spermatozoa.
Dai C; Zhang Z; Jahangiri S; Shan G; Moskovstev S; Librach C; Jarvi K; Sun Y
Andrology; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1205-1213. PubMed ID: 33740840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision
Engel KM; Grunewald S; Schiller J; Paasch U
Andrologia; 2019 Feb; 51(1):e13149. PubMed ID: 30255510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of classical and automated sperm analysis for in-vitro fertilization.
Barlow P; Delvigne A; Van Dromme J; Van Hoeck J; Vandenbosch K; Leroy F
Hum Reprod; 1991 Sep; 6(8):1119-24. PubMed ID: 1806572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sperm motility index.
Schieferstein G; Hook-Vervier B; Schwarz M
Arch Androl; 1998; 40(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 9466001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Manual versus computer-automated semen analysis.
Köse M; Sokmensuer LK; Demir A; Bozdag G; Gunalp S
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 25551959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.
Joshi N; Kodwany G; Balaiah D; Parikh M; Parikh F
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8673156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are sperm parameters able to predict the success of assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of over 22,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Villani MT; Morini D; Spaggiari G; Falbo AI; Melli B; La Sala GB; Romeo M; Simoni M; Aguzzoli L; Santi D
Andrology; 2022 Feb; 10(2):310-321. PubMed ID: 34723422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fertilizing capacity of rat spermatozoa is correlated with decline in straight-line velocity measured by continuous computer-aided sperm analysis: epididymal rat spermatozoa from the proximal cauda have a greater fertilizing capacity in vitro than those from the distal cauda or vas deferens.
Moore HD; Akhondi MA
J Androl; 1996; 17(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 8833741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced methods for evaluation of sperm quality.
Yavetz H; Hauser R; Yogev L; Botchan A; Lessing JB; Homonnai ZT; Paz G
Andrologia; 1995; 27(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 7755187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the Sperm Quality Analyzer.
Johnston RC; Clarke GN; Liu DY; Baker HW
Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 7720920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship of semen parameters to fertilization in patients participating in a program of in vitro fertilization.
Alper MM; Lee GS; Seibel MM; Smith D; Oskowitz SP; Ransil BJ; Taymor ML
J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1985 Dec; 2(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 4093705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment.
Schubert B; Badiou M; Force A
Andrologia; 2019 Nov; 51(10):e13417. PubMed ID: 31475742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mycoplasmas and in vitro fertilization.
Hill AC; Tucker MJ; Whittingham DG; Craft I
Fertil Steril; 1987 Apr; 47(4):652-5. PubMed ID: 3552747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between sperm motility assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and fertilization rates in vitro.
Liu DY; Clarke GN; Baker HW
J Androl; 1991; 12(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 1917688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and semen quality parameters in male partners of couples attempting fertility.
Karayiannis D; Kontogianni MD; Mendorou C; Douka L; Mastrominas M; Yiannakouris N
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 27994040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sperm morphology evaluated by computer (IVOS) cannot predict the fertilization rate in vitro after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Sukcharoen N; Sithipravej T; Promviengchai S; Chinpilas V; Boonkasemsanti W
Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 9531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of human sperm morphology using strict criteria after Diff-Quik staining: correlation of morphology with fertilization in vitro.
Enginsu ME; Dumoulin JC; Pieters MH; Bras M; Evers JL; Geraedts JP
Hum Reprod; 1991 Jul; 6(6):854-8. PubMed ID: 1721921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
