124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36097845)
21. Relationships between human sperm acrosin, acrosomes, morphology and fertilization in vitro.
Liu DY; Baker HW
Hum Reprod; 1990 Apr; 5(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 2351713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sperm head morphometry analysis of ejaculate and dismount stallion semen samples.
Gravance CG; Champion Z; Liu IK; Casey PJ
Anim Reprod Sci; 1997 May; 47(1-2):149-55. PubMed ID: 9233514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests.
Wang C; Swerdloff RS
Fertil Steril; 2014 Dec; 102(6):1502-7. PubMed ID: 25458617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Abnormal sperm morphology and other semen parameters related to the outcome of the hamster oocyte human sperm penetration assay.
Kruger TF; Swanson RJ; Hamilton M; Simmons KF; Acosta AA; Matta JF; Oehniger S; Morshedi M
Int J Androl; 1988 Apr; 11(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 3372044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Volumetric analysis of human spermatozoa.
Jeyendran RS; Karuhn RF; Van der Ven HH; Perez-Pelaez M
Andrologia; 1987; 19(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 3688479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does computerized image analysis of sperm movement enhance the predictive value of semen analysis for in-vitro fertilization results?
Grunert JH; de Geyter C; Bordt J; Schneider HP; Nieschlag E
Int J Androl; 1989 Oct; 12(5):329-38. PubMed ID: 2592121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A prospective study on the predictive value of normal sperm morphology as evaluated by computer (IVOS).
Kruger TF; Lacquet FA; Sarmiento CA; Menkveld R; Ozgür K; Lombard CJ; Franken DR
Fertil Steril; 1996 Aug; 66(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 8690118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can the Sperm Class Analyser (SCA) CASA-Mot system for human sperm motility analysis reduce imprecision and operator subjectivity and improve semen analysis?
Dearing C; Jayasena C; Lindsay K
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 31056980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of human papilloma virus in semen as a risk factor for low sperm quality and poor in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Weinberg M; Sar-Shalom Nahshon C; Feferkorn I; Bornstein J
Fertil Steril; 2020 May; 113(5):955-969.e4. PubMed ID: 32386620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men.
Hart RJ; Doherty DA; McLachlan RI; Walls ML; Keelan JA; Dickinson JE; Skakkebaek NE; Norman RJ; Handelsman DJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2713-24. PubMed ID: 26409015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of sperm fertilizing ability using the Sperm Quality Analyzer.
Shibahara H; Naito S; Hasegawa A; Mitsuo M; Shigeta M; Koyama K
Int J Androl; 1997 Apr; 20(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 9292322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predicting the fertilizing potential of human sperm suspensions in vitro: importance of sperm morphology and leukocyte contamination.
Sukcharoen N; Keith J; Irvine DS; Aitken RJ
Fertil Steril; 1995 Jun; 63(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 7538475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Progressive motility - a potential predictive parameter for semen fertilization capacity in bovines.
Li Y; Kalo D; Zeron Y; Roth Z
Zygote; 2016 Feb; 24(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 25532584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship between human sperm-hyaluronan binding assay and fertilization rate in conventional in vitro fertilization.
Ye H; Huang GN; Gao Y; Liu DY
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 16595551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sperm morphology assessment as an indicator of human fertilizing capacity.
Rogers BJ; Bentwood BJ; Van Campen H; Helmbrecht G; Soderdahl D; Hale RW
J Androl; 1983; 4(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 6853356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome.
Donnelly ET; Lewis SE; McNally JA; Thompson W
Fertil Steril; 1998 Aug; 70(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 9696226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
Agarwal A; Sharma RK
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Human β-defensin 1 in follicular fluid and semen: impact on fertility.
Zupin L; Polesello V; Martinelli M; Luppi S; Giolo E; Zito G; Romano F; Segat L; Crovella S; Ricci G
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Apr; 36(4):787-797. PubMed ID: 30712073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. External quality control program for semen analysis: Spanish experience.
Alvarez C; Castilla JA; Ramírez JP; Vergara F; Yoldi A; Fernández A; Gaforio JJ
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2005 Dec; 22(11-12):379-87. PubMed ID: 16331534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A multilaboratory study on the variability of bovine semen analysis.
Brito LF
Theriogenology; 2016 Jan; 85(2):254-66. PubMed ID: 26671653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
