140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36098817)
1. Use of modifying phrases in surgical pathology reports: is there a different understanding between pathologists and treating physicians?
Prieto VG; Vollmer RT; Shea CR
Virchows Arch; 2022 Nov; 481(5):759-766. PubMed ID: 36098817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modifying phrases in surgical pathology reports: introduction of Standardized Scheme of Reporting Certainty in Pathology Reports (SSRC-Path).
Amin A; DeLellis RA; Fava JL
Virchows Arch; 2021 Nov; 479(5):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 34272982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communicating Certainty in Pathology Reports.
Gibson BA; McKinnon E; Bentley RC; Mohlman J; Witt BL; Yang EJ; Geisler D; DeFrances M
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 146(7):886-893. PubMed ID: 34669920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Communicating uncertainty in pathology reports: a descriptive study from a specialized cancer center.
Jaber O; Ammar K; Sughayer M
Acad Pathol; 2024; 11(1):100109. PubMed ID: 38433775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiologist Preferences, Agreement, and Variability in Phrases Used to Convey Diagnostic Certainty in Radiology Reports.
Shinagare AB; Lacson R; Boland GW; Wang A; Silverman SG; Mayo-Smith WW; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt A):458-464. PubMed ID: 30584042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communicating diagnostic uncertainty in surgical pathology reports: disparities between sender and receiver.
Lindley SW; Gillies EM; Hassell LA
Pathol Res Pract; 2014 Oct; 210(10):628-33. PubMed ID: 24939143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The interpretation of phrases used to describe uncertainty in pathology reports.
Galloway M; Taiyeb T
Patholog Res Int; 2011; 2011():656079. PubMed ID: 21876845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?
Khorasani R; Bates DW; Teeger S; Rothschild JM; Adams DF; Seltzer SE
Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 12809424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phraseology in pathology reports. A comparative study of interpretation among pathologists and surgeons.
Attanoos RL; Bull AD; Douglas-Jones AG; Fligelstone LJ; Semararo D
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jan; 49(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 8666692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter survey clarifying phrases in emergency radiology reports.
Ogawa M; Lee CH; Friedman B
Emerg Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):855-862. PubMed ID: 35701617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why won't the pathologist give me a diagnosis? Interpreting uncertainty in head and neck pathology reports.
Stephens-LaBorde IS; Brierley DJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 60(5):577-583. PubMed ID: 35365340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferences of clinical pathologists for probability-modifying terms describing cytologic sample evaluations: A survey study.
Rishniw M; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():60-64. PubMed ID: 37496234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Communicating Uncertainty in Surgical Pathology Reports: A Survey of Staff Physicians and Residents at an Academic Medical Center.
Bracamonte E; Gibson BA; Klein R; Krupinski EA; Weinstein RS
Acad Pathol; 2016; 3():2374289516659079. PubMed ID: 28725774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretive Differences Between Patients and Radiologists Regarding the Diagnostic Confidence Associated With Commonly Used Phrases in the Radiology Report.
Mityul MI; Gilcrease-Garcia B; Searleman A; Demertzis JL; Gunn AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):123-126. PubMed ID: 29023151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What constitutes a histological confirmation of cancer? A survey of terminology interpretation in two English regions.
Silcocks P; Page M
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Mar; 54(3):246-8. PubMed ID: 11253141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical value in surgical pathology: evaluating the current status in a multicenter study.
Soleimani N; Zare Sheibani A; Khajeh S; Mohammadzadeh S; Taheri N; Mokhtari M; Farhadi M; Hajizade Z; Khaleghpanah S; Dehghani S
Diagn Pathol; 2023 Apr; 18(1):55. PubMed ID: 37106381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are We Speaking the Same Language? Communicating Diagnostic Probability in the Radiology Report.
Grant MD; O'Reilly CR; Ladner JR; Mack LD; McGrain AH; Colburn ZT; Boldt BM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):806-811. PubMed ID: 33474980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Unexpected expectations in critical values in anatomic pathology: improving agreement between pathologists and nonpathologists with the treatable immediately, life-threatening terminology.
Renshaw SA; Gould EW; Renshaw AA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 22032563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
