These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36099023)

  • 1. Stomatal conductance tracks soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance in faba bean and maize during soil drying.
    Müllers Y; Postma JA; Poorter H; van Dusschoten D
    Plant Physiol; 2022 Nov; 190(4):2279-2294. PubMed ID: 36099023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Above and belowground traits impacting transpiration decline during soil drying in 48 maize (Zea mays) genotypes.
    Koehler T; Schaum C; Tung SY; Steiner F; Tyborski N; Wild AJ; Akale A; Pausch J; Lueders T; Wolfrum S; Mueller CW; Vidal A; Vahl WK; Groth J; Eder B; Ahmed MA; Carminati A
    Ann Bot; 2023 Mar; 131(2):373-386. PubMed ID: 36479887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transpiration Reduction in Maize (
    Hayat F; Ahmed MA; Zarebanadkouki M; Javaux M; Cai G; Carminati A
    Front Plant Sci; 2019; 10():1695. PubMed ID: 32038676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep-water uptake under drought improved due to locally increased root conductivity in maize, but not in faba bean.
    Müllers Y; Postma JA; Poorter H; van Dusschoten D
    Plant Cell Environ; 2023 Jul; 46(7):2046-2060. PubMed ID: 36942406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aquaporin regulation in roots controls plant hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in Pinus radiata under water stress.
    Rodríguez-Gamir J; Xue J; Clearwater MJ; Meason DF; Clinton PW; Domec JC
    Plant Cell Environ; 2019 Feb; 42(2):717-729. PubMed ID: 30307040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-hydraulic signals from maize roots in drying soil: inhibition of leaf elongation but not stomatal conductance.
    Saab IN; Sharp RE
    Planta; 1989 Nov; 179(4):466-74. PubMed ID: 24201770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hydraulic model is compatible with rapid changes in leaf elongation under fluctuating evaporative demand and soil water status.
    Caldeira CF; Bosio M; Parent B; Jeanguenin L; Chaumont F; Tardieu F
    Plant Physiol; 2014 Apr; 164(4):1718-30. PubMed ID: 24420931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil-root hydraulic resistance.
    Abdalla M; Carminati A; Cai G; Javaux M; Ahmed MA
    Plant Cell Environ; 2021 Feb; 44(2):425-431. PubMed ID: 33150971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulation of transpirational water loss in Quercus suber trees in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem.
    Otieno DO; Schmidt MW; Kurz-Besson C; Lobo Do Vale R; Pereira JS; Tenhunen JD
    Tree Physiol; 2007 Aug; 27(8):1179-87. PubMed ID: 17472943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aquaporin-mediated reduction in maize root hydraulic conductivity impacts cell turgor and leaf elongation even without changing transpiration.
    Ehlert C; Maurel C; Tardieu F; Simonneau T
    Plant Physiol; 2009 Jun; 150(2):1093-104. PubMed ID: 19369594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stomatal and growth responses to hydraulic and chemical changes induced by progressive soil drying.
    Li X; Wilkinson S; Shen J; Forde BG; Davies WJ
    J Exp Bot; 2017 Dec; 68(21-22):5883-5894. PubMed ID: 29126265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water relations in tree physiology: where to from here?
    Landsberg J; Waring R; Ryan M
    Tree Physiol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):18-32. PubMed ID: 28173481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of vapour pressure deficit on stomatal conductance, sap pH and leaf-specific hydraulic conductance in Eucalyptus globulus clones grown under two watering regimes.
    Hernandez MJ; Montes F; Ruiz F; Lopez G; Pita P
    Ann Bot; 2016 May; 117(6):1063-71. PubMed ID: 27052343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of hydraulic and chemical signals in leaves, stems and roots in the stomatal behaviour of olive trees under water stress and recovery conditions.
    Torres-Ruiz JM; Diaz-Espejo A; Perez-Martin A; Hernandez-Santana V
    Tree Physiol; 2015 Apr; 35(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 25030936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic soil hydraulic resistance regulates stomata.
    Manandhar A; Rimer IM; Soares Pereira T; Pichaco J; Rockwell FE; McAdam SAM
    New Phytol; 2024 Oct; 244(1):147-158. PubMed ID: 39096020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stomatal closure during water deficit is controlled by below-ground hydraulics.
    Abdalla M; Ahmed MA; Cai G; Wankmüller F; Schwartz N; Litig O; Javaux M; Carminati A
    Ann Bot; 2022 Jan; 129(2):161-170. PubMed ID: 34871349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure deficit reflect tissue-specific differences in hydraulic conductance.
    Ocheltree TW; Nippert JB; Prasad PV
    Plant Cell Environ; 2014 Jan; 37(1):132-9. PubMed ID: 23701708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation.
    Domec JC; Noormets A; King JS; Sun G; McNulty SG; Gavazzi MJ; Boggs JL; Treasure EA
    Plant Cell Environ; 2009 Aug; 32(8):980-91. PubMed ID: 19344336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transpiration response to soil drying versus increasing vapor pressure deficit in crops: physical and physiological mechanisms and key plant traits.
    Koehler T; Wankmüller FJP; Sadok W; Carminati A
    J Exp Bot; 2023 Sep; 74(16):4789-4807. PubMed ID: 37354081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Declining root water transport drives stomatal closure in olive under moderate water stress.
    Rodriguez-Dominguez CM; Brodribb TJ
    New Phytol; 2020 Jan; 225(1):126-134. PubMed ID: 31498457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.