195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36100184)
21. Mo
Lu S; Lu B; Tan G; Moe W; Xu W; Wang Y; Xing D; Zhu X
Biosens Bioelectron; 2020 Nov; 167():112491. PubMed ID: 32798808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Enhancement of hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell through anode arrangement optimization.
Liang DW; Peng SK; Lu SF; Liu YY; Lan F; Xiang Y
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Dec; 102(23):10881-5. PubMed ID: 21974881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High Biofilm Conductivity Maintained Despite Anode Potential Changes in a Geobacter-Enriched Biofilm.
Dhar BR; Ryu H; Ren H; Domingo JW; Chae J; Lee HS
ChemSusChem; 2016 Dec; 9(24):3485-3491. PubMed ID: 27870324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hydrogen production from macroalgae by simultaneous dark fermentation and microbial electrolysis cell.
Nguyen PKT; Das G; Kim J; Yoon HH
Bioresour Technol; 2020 Nov; 315():123795. PubMed ID: 32659424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of ammonia on electrochemical active biofilm in microbial electrolysis cells for synthetic swine wastewater treatment.
Wang N; Feng Y; Li Y; Zhang L; Liu J; Li N; He W
Water Res; 2022 Jul; 219():118570. PubMed ID: 35597221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hydrogen production from sugar beet juice using an integrated biohydrogen process of dark fermentation and microbial electrolysis cell.
Dhar BR; Elbeshbishy E; Hafez H; Lee HS
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Dec; 198():223-30. PubMed ID: 26398665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Linking internal resistance with design and operation decisions in microbial electrolysis cells.
Miller A; Singh L; Wang L; Liu H
Environ Int; 2019 May; 126():611-618. PubMed ID: 30856448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Two-stage conversion of crude glycerol to energy using dark fermentation linked with microbial fuel cell or microbial electrolysis cell.
Chookaew T; Prasertsan P; Ren ZJ
N Biotechnol; 2014 Mar; 31(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24380781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved bio-hydrogen production from glucose by adding a specific methane inhibitor to microbial electrolysis cells with a double anode arrangement.
Zhang J; Bai Y; Fan Y; Hou H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2016 Oct; 122(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 27094956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microbial bioelectrosynthesis of hydrogen: Current challenges and scale-up.
Kitching M; Butler R; Marsili E
Enzyme Microb Technol; 2017 Jan; 96():1-13. PubMed ID: 27871368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Feasibility of quaternary ammonium and 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-functionalized anion-exchange membranes for biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells.
Cardeña R; Žitka J; Koók L; Bakonyi P; Pavlovec L; Otmar M; Nemestóthy N; Buitrón G
Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Jun; 133():107479. PubMed ID: 32086178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biohydrogen production and purification: Focusing on bioelectrochemical systems.
Lee HS; Lee SY; Yoo K; Kim HW; Lee E; Im NG
Bioresour Technol; 2022 Nov; 363():127956. PubMed ID: 36115508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Integrated hydrogen production process from cellulose by combining dark fermentation, microbial fuel cells, and a microbial electrolysis cell.
Wang A; Sun D; Cao G; Wang H; Ren N; Wu WM; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Mar; 102(5):4137-43. PubMed ID: 21216594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of Nanomaterials and Other Factors on Biohydrogen Production Rates in Microbial Electrolysis Cells-A Review.
Abd-Elrahman NK; Al-Harbi N; Al-Hadeethi Y; Alruqi AB; Mohammed H; Umar A; Akbar S
Molecules; 2022 Dec; 27(23):. PubMed ID: 36500687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surpassing the current limitations of high purity H
Kadier A; Kalil MS; Chandrasekhar K; Mohanakrishna G; Saratale GD; Saratale RG; Kumar G; Pugazhendhi A; Sivagurunathan P
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Feb; 119():211-219. PubMed ID: 29073521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Enhancing bioelectrochemical hydrogen production from industrial wastewater using Ni-foam cathodes in a microbial electrolysis cell pilot plant.
Guerrero-Sodric O; Baeza JA; Guisasola A
Water Res; 2024 Jun; 256():121616. PubMed ID: 38657305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hydrophilic porous materials provide efficient gas-liquid separation to advance hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells.
Zhao N; Liang D; Li X; Meng S; Liu H
Bioresour Technol; 2021 Oct; 337():125352. PubMed ID: 34098503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Damage of anodic biofilms by high salinity deteriorates PAHs degradation in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell reactor.
Ding P; Wu P; Jie Z; Cui MH; Liu H
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 777():145752. PubMed ID: 33684746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An MEC-MFC-coupled system for biohydrogen production from acetate.
Sun M; Sheng GP; Zhang L; Xia CR; Mu ZX; Liu XW; Wang HL; Yu HQ; Qi R; Yu T; Yang M
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Nov; 42(21):8095-100. PubMed ID: 19031908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The source of inoculum plays a defining role in the development of MEC microbial consortia fed with acetic and propionic acid mixtures.
Ruiz V; Ilhan ZE; Kang DW; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Buitrón G
J Biotechnol; 2014 Jul; 182-183():11-8. PubMed ID: 24798298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
