214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36100722)
1. Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns designed using three different dental CAD programs: a 3-dimensional digital analysis study.
Farah RI; Alresheedi B
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):263-271. PubMed ID: 36100722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study.
Sanchez-Lara A; Hosney S; Lampraki E; Conejo J; Blatz MB; Barmak AB; Ercoli C; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 36883776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
Meirowitz A; Bitterman Y; Levy S; Mijiritsky E; Dolev E
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: A microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps.
Atlas AM; Janyavula S; Elsabee R; Alper E; Isleem WF; Bergler M; Setzer FC
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 35643825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does cad software affect the marginal and internal fit of milled full ceramic crowns?
Akat B; Şentürk A; Ocak M; Kiliçarslan MA; Özcan M
Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e042. PubMed ID: 35293507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 3D-Printed Single Crown Outcomes Among Different Computer-Aided Design Software Programs.
No-Cortes J; Attard B; Mifsud DP; Lima JF; Markarian RA; Ayres AP; Cassar G; Cortes ARG; Attard NJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):63-70. PubMed ID: 38489222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data.
Şeker E; Ozcelik TB; Rathi N; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 26518986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
