129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36101970)
1. Assessment of commercial polymers with and without reactive groups using amino acid derivative reactivity assay based on both molar concentration approach and gravimetric approach.
Fujita M; Nakashima N; Wanibuchi S; Yamamoto Y; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T
J Appl Toxicol; 2023 Mar; 43(3):446-457. PubMed ID: 36101970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicability of amino acid derivative reactivity assay (4 mM) for the prediction of skin sensitization by combining multiple alternative methods to evaluate key events.
Imamura M; Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Nakashima N; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T
J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Jul; 42(7):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 34993977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving predictive capacity of the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay test method for skin sensitization potential with an optimal molar concentration of test chemical solution.
Imamura M; Wanibuchi S; Yamamoto Y; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 41(2):303-329. PubMed ID: 33124715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amino acid derivative reactivity assay-organic solvent reaction system: A novel alternative test for skin sensitization capable of assessing highly hydrophobic substances.
Yamaga H; Watanabe S; Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Kasahara T; Kataoka S
J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Oct; 41(10):1634-1648. PubMed ID: 33636015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applicability of amino acid derivative reactivity assay for prediction of skin sensitization by combining multiple alternative methods to evaluate key events.
Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Sato A; Akimoto M; Katsuoka Y; Ono A; Kasahara T
J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(9):585-600. PubMed ID: 31474740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel in chemico method to detect skin sensitizers in highly diluted reaction conditions.
Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Usami R; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T; Fujita M
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1348-60. PubMed ID: 25809859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cause of and countermeasures for oxidation of the cysteine-derived reagent used in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.
Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Sugawara T; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kurokawa Y; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Kojima H; Ono A; Katsuoka Y; Tanabe H; Yokoyama H; Kasahara T
J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 30221369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precipitation of test chemicals in reaction solutions used in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay and the direct peptide reactivity assay.
Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Sato A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 100():106624. PubMed ID: 31445998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The amino acid derivative reactivity assay with fluorescence detection and its application to multi-constituent substances.
Wanibuchi S; Yamamoto Y; Sato A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(12):821-832. PubMed ID: 31813901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expanding the applicability of the amino acid derivative reactivity assay: Determining a weight for preparation of test chemical solutions that yield a predictive capacity identical to the conventional method using molar concentration and demonstrating the capacity to detect sensitizers in liquid mixtures.
Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Katsuoka Y; Ono A; Kasahara T
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 97():67-79. PubMed ID: 30796999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a prediction method for skin sensitization using novel cysteine and lysine derivatives.
Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2014; 70(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 24928155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within- and between-laboratory reproducibility and predictive capacity of amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) using a 0.5 mg/mL test chemical solution: Results of the study for reproducibility confirmation implemented in five participating laboratories.
Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Takeuchi K; Kamiya K; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1078-1090. PubMed ID: 35043433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The within- and between-laboratories reproducibility and predictive capacity of Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay using 4 mM test chemical solution: Results of ring study implemented at five participating laboratories.
Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Takeuchi K; Kamiya K; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):318-333. PubMed ID: 34855227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [In chemico skin sensitization alternative method: development of ADRA and listing to OECD test guideline].
Kasahara T; Fujita M
Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi; 2022; 157(5):345-350. PubMed ID: 36047150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of in chemico skin sensitization methods and development of an in chemico skin photosensitization assay.
Patel NH; Mishra PK; Nagane R; Deshpande A; Tamboli IY; Date R
ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):373-387. PubMed ID: 30865783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The within- and between-laboratory reproducibility and predictive capacity of the in chemico amino acid derivative reactivity assay: Results of validation study implemented in four participating laboratories.
Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Sugawara T; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kurokawa Y; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Nakayama T; Kusao T; Richmond J; Nicole K; Kim BH; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):1492-1505. PubMed ID: 31313332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A newly developed means of HPLC-fluorescence analysis for predicting the skin sensitization potential of multi-constituent substances using ADRA.
Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Katsuoka Y; Kasahara T
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Sep; 59():161-178. PubMed ID: 31002975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The underlying factors that explain why nucleophilic reagents rarely co-elute with test chemicals in the ADRA.
Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Katsuoka Y; Kasahara T
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 96():95-105. PubMed ID: 30776483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Off to a good start? Review of the predictivity of reactivity methods modelling the molecular initiating event of skin sensitization.
Alépée N; Tourneix F; Singh A; Ade N; Grégoire S
ALTEX; 2023; 40(4):606-618. PubMed ID: 37314401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oxidation of a cysteine-derived nucleophilic reagent by dimethyl sulfoxide in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.
Akimoto M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Yoshida K; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kamiya K; Kojima K; Kawakami T; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
J Appl Toxicol; 2020 Jun; 40(6):843-854. PubMed ID: 32052484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
