136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36102169)
1. Wavefront aberrometry repeatability and agreement-A comparison between Pentacam AXL Wave, iTrace and OPD-Scan III.
Wan KH; Liao XL; Yu M; Tsui RWY; Chow VWS; Chong KKL; Chan TCY
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1326-1337. PubMed ID: 36102169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the comparability and repeatability of four wavefront aberrometers.
Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; Tan AN; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Mar; 52(3):1302-11. PubMed ID: 21051697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision and agreement of higher order aberrations measured with ray tracing and Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.
Xu Z; Hua Y; Qiu W; Li G; Wu Q
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):18. PubMed ID: 29374460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer.
Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 22543999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of tear optics on the repeatability of Pentacam AXL wave and iTrace in measuring anterior segment parameters and aberrations.
Kundu G; Shetty R; Khamar P; Gupta S; Mullick R; Ganesan VL; D'Souza S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 70(4):1150-1157. PubMed ID: 35326004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision of a commercial hartmann-shack aberrometer: limits of total wavefront laser vision correction.
López-Miguel A; Maldonado MJ; Belzunce A; Barrio-Barrio J; Coco-Martín MB; Nieto JC
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):799-807.e5. PubMed ID: 22902046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability and Agreement of a New Scheimpflug Device and a Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer With a Ray-Tracing Aberrometer in Normal, Keratoconus, and CXL Groups.
Kundu G; Shetty R; Ranade R; Trivedi D; Lalgudi VG; Nuijts RMMA; Annavajjhala S; Khamar P
J Refract Surg; 2022 Mar; 38(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 35275005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of higher order wavefront aberrations with four aberrometers.
Cook WH; McKelvie J; Wallace HB; Misra SL
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 67(7):1030-1035. PubMed ID: 31238402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ocular higher-order aberrations in myopia and skiascopic wavefront repeatability.
Zadok D; Levy Y; Segal O; Barkana Y; Morad Y; Avni I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1128-32. PubMed ID: 16039485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and agreement of wavefront aberrations of a new hybrid topographer and aberrometer in healthy eyes.
Shetty R; Trivedi D; Ranade R; Arun S; Khamar P; Kundu G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Apr; 48(4):408-416. PubMed ID: 34393184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OPD-Scan III: a repeatability and inter-device agreement study of a multifunctional device in emmetropia, ametropia, and keratoconus.
Asgari S; Hashemi H; Jafarzadehpur E; Mohamadi A; Rezvan F; Fotouhi A
Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 36(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 26854319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precision of higher-order aberration measurements with a new Placido-disk topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor.
López-Miguel A; Martínez-Almeida L; González-García MJ; Coco-Martín MB; Sobrado-Calvo P; Maldonado MJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 23142546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ocular aberrations measured by a Fourier-based Hartmann-Shack and Zernike-based Tscherning aberrometer before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Sáles CS; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1820-5. PubMed ID: 26603389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Ocular Wavefront Aberration Measurements Obtained Using Two Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Aberrometers.
Koh S; Inoue R; Iwamoto Y; Mihashi T; Soma T; Maeda N; Nishida K
Eye Contact Lens; 2023 Mar; 49(3):98-103. PubMed ID: 36729105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precision of higher order aberration repeatability with NIDEK OPD-scan retinoscopic aberrometry.
Barreto J; Netto MV; Cigna A; Bechara S; Kara-José N
J Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 22(9 Suppl):S1037-40. PubMed ID: 17444090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of internal and total optical aberrations for 2 aberrometers: iTrace and OPD scan.
Won JB; Kim SW; Kim EK; Ha BJ; Kim TI
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 22(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 19096236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of higher order aberrations measured by NIDEK OPD-Scan dynamic skiascopy and Zeiss WASCA Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.
Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montés-Micó R
J Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 24(8):790-6. PubMed ID: 18856232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and NIDEK OPD-scan aberrometers.
Kim DS; Narváez J; Krassin J; Bahjri K
J Refract Surg; 2009 May; 25(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19507795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of Wavefront Aberration Measurements With a Placido-Based Topographer in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
Ortiz-Toquero S; Rodriguez G; de Juan V; Martin R
J Refract Surg; 2016 May; 32(5):338-44. PubMed ID: 27163620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
