These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36102864)

  • 1. Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?
    Huls SPI; Lancsar E; Donkers B; Ride J
    Health Econ; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2630-2647. PubMed ID: 36102864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques.
    Erdem S; Campbell D
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 18(9):1107-1123. PubMed ID: 27942967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
    Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.
    Potoglou D; Burge P; Flynn T; Netten A; Malley J; Forder J; Brazier JE
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1717-27. PubMed ID: 21530040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
    Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
    Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best-Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
    Ratcliffe J; Kaambwa B; Hutchinson C; Lancsar E
    Patient; 2020 Jun; 13(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 31930462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of alternative preference elicitation methods in complex discrete choice experiments.
    Yoo HI; Doiron D
    J Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1166-79. PubMed ID: 24144729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.
    Malhotra R; Suppiah SD; Tan YW; Sung P; Tay SSC; Tan NC; Koh GC; Chan A; Chew LST; Ozdemir S;
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2023 Nov; 19(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 37507340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.
    Friedel JE; Foreman AM; Wirth O
    Behav Processes; 2022 May; 198():104628. PubMed ID: 35354088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.
    van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using discrete choice experiments to elicit the service preferences of people with mild intellectual disability: An exploratory study.
    Hutchinson C; Milte R; Stanley M; Duff G; Ratcliffe J
    Health Soc Care Community; 2022 Jul; 30(4):e1396-e1405. PubMed ID: 34418195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
    Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
    Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Ordered Categorical versus Discrete Choices within a Stated Preference Survey of Whole-Blood Donors.
    Sadique Z; Cairns J; De Corte K; Willis S; Miners A; Bansback N; Grieve R
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):362-373. PubMed ID: 36565248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices.
    Whichello C; Smith I; Veldwijk J; de Wit GA; Rutten-van Molken MPMH; de Bekker-Grob EW
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0283926. PubMed ID: 37506078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
    Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
    Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.