These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36102891)
21. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions. Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method. Dupagne L; Tapie L; Lebon N; Mawussi B J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 33781577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy. Borbola D; Berkei G; Simon B; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Vag J J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104391. PubMed ID: 36549570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study. Gurpinar B; Tak O J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans. de Andrade GS; Luz JN; Tribst JPM; Chun EP; Bressane A; Borges ALS; Saavedra GSFA J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans? Reich S; Yatmaz B; Raith S J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32059858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of crown shade, translucency, and scan powder application on the trueness of intraoral scanners. Hlaing NHMM; Lee H; Jeong Y; Park JM; Lee SJ; Lee JH J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104969. PubMed ID: 38537881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of different preparation designs of minimally invasive occlusal onlays on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Ashraf K; Ebeid K; Salah T J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38053453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature]. Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of four different intraoral scanners according to different preparation geometries. Schmidt A; Benedickt CR; Schlenz MA; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):756–762. PubMed ID: 33625402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners. Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]