169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36104252)
1. Does the use of bioabsorbable mesh for hiatal hernia repair at the time of bariatric surgery reduce recurrence rates? A meta-analysis.
Clapp B; Kara AM; Nguyen-Lee PJ; Alvarado L; Marr JD; Annabi HM; Davis B; Ghanem OM
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2022 Dec; 18(12):1407-1415. PubMed ID: 36104252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does bioabsorbable mesh reduce hiatal hernia recurrence rates? A meta-analysis.
Clapp B; Kara AM; Nguyen-Lee PJ; Annabi HM; Alvarado L; Marr JD; Ghanem OM; Davis B
Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):2295-2303. PubMed ID: 35951120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term results for laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias with Gore Bio A® mesh.
Priego Jiménez P; Salvador Sanchís JL; Angel V; Escrig-Sos J
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(8):794-7. PubMed ID: 24947948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A technique for placement of a bioabsorbable prosthesis with fibrin glue fixation for reinforcement of the crural closure during hiatal hernia repair.
Powell BS; Wandrey D; Voeller GR
Hernia; 2013 Feb; 17(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 22581201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh.
Koetje JH; Oor JE; Roks DJ; Van Westreenen HL; Hazebroek EJ; Nieuwenhuijs VB
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3673-3680. PubMed ID: 28078457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Mesh hiatal hernioplasty' versus 'suture cruroplasty' in laparoscopic para-oesophageal hernia surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sathasivam R; Bussa G; Viswanath Y; Obuobi RB; Gill T; Reddy A; Shanmugam V; Gilliam A; Thambi P
Asian J Surg; 2019 Jan; 42(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 29887394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair with mesh.
Gebhart A; Vu S; Armstrong C; Smith BR; Nguyen NT
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1017-21. PubMed ID: 24160791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coated poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Phasix ST™) mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair: our institutional experience and review of the literature.
Fair L; Ward M; Adhikari P; Tran D; Pina E; Ramakrishnan S; Ogola G; Aladegbami B; Leeds S
Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):830-836. PubMed ID: 38082013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hiatal hernia repair with biologic mesh reinforcement reduces recurrence rate in small hiatal hernias.
Schmidt E; Shaligram A; Reynoso JF; Kothari V; Oleynikov D
Dis Esophagus; 2014 Jan; 27(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23441634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement.
Iossa A; Silecchia G
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3783-3789. PubMed ID: 30675663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Collective Review of Gore Bio-A Absorbable Synthetic Mesh in Cruroplasty Reinforcement.
Olson MT; Mittal SK; Bremner RM
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Jan; 31(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 32882152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair.
Tam V; Winger DG; Nason KS
Am J Surg; 2016 Jan; 211(1):226-38. PubMed ID: 26520872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concomitant hiatal hernia repair during bariatric surgery: does the reinforcement make the difference?
Boru CE; Termine P; Antypas P; Iossa A; Ciccioriccio CM; DE Angelis F; Micalizzi A; Silecchia G
Minerva Surg; 2021 Feb; 76(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 33006451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic bioabsorbable mesh for hiatal hernia repair during sleeve gastrectomy.
Clapp B
JSLS; 2013; 17(4):641-4. PubMed ID: 24398209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crura augmentation with Bio-A
Asti E; Sironi A; Bonitta G; Lovece A; Milito P; Bonavina L
Hernia; 2017 Aug; 21(4):623-628. PubMed ID: 28396955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review.
Lima DL; de Figueiredo SMP; Pereira X; Murillo FR; Sreeramoju P; Malcher F; Damani T
Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7425-7436. PubMed ID: 37721592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suture Cruroplasty Versus Prosthetic Hiatal Herniorrhaphy for Large Hiatal Hernia: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Memon MA; Memon B; Yunus RM; Khan S
Ann Surg; 2016 Feb; 263(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 26445468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cruroplasty with or without mesh? A systematic literature review with a novel time-organized proportion meta-analysis.
Latorre-Rodríguez AR; Rajan A; Mittal SK
Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):1685-1708. PubMed ID: 38351425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Analatos A; Håkanson BS; Lundell L; Lindblad M; Thorell A
Br J Surg; 2020 Dec; 107(13):1731-1740. PubMed ID: 32936951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic management of large hiatal hernia: mesh method with the use of ProGrip mesh versus standard crural repair.
Ilyashenko VV; Grubnyk VV; Grubnik VV
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3592-3598. PubMed ID: 29423552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
