265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36104929)
1. Direct comparison of two 50 W high power short duration approaches-Temperature- versus ablation index-guided radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Guckel D; Bergau L; Braun M; El Hamriti M; Mörsdorf M; Fink T; Sciacca V; Khalaph M; Imnadze G; Sommer P; Sohns C
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Dec; 33(12):2517-2527. PubMed ID: 36104929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acute oesophageal safety and long-term follow-up of AI-guided high-power short-duration with 50 W for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Zhuravlev V; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Behnes M; Halbfass P; Deneke T
Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1379-1391. PubMed ID: 36881791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Higher power short duration vs. lower power longer duration posterior wall ablation for atrial fibrillation and oesophageal injury outcomes: a prospective multi-centre randomized controlled study (Hi-Lo HEAT trial).
Chieng D; Segan L; Sugumar H; Al-Kaisey A; Hawson J; Moore BM; Nam MCY; Voskoboinik A; Prabhu S; Ling LH; Ng JF; Brown G; Lee G; Morton J; Debinski H; Kalman JM; Kistler PM
Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):417-424. PubMed ID: 36305561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes between high-power short-duration, standard-power standard-duration, and temperature-controlled noncontact force guided ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Dikdan SJ; Junarta J; Bodempudi S; Upadhyay N; Pang Z; Frisch DR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 33415782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns.
Hansom SP; Alqarawi W; Birnie DH; Golian M; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Klein A; Green MS; Davis DR; Sheppard-Perkins E; Ramirez FD; Nair GM; Sadek MM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 32(5):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 33751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Procedural efficacy and safety of standardized, ablation index guided fixed 50 W high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification using the CLOSE protocol.
Francke A; Taha NS; Scharfe F; Schoen S; Wunderlich C; Christoph M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Sep; 32(9):2408-2417. PubMed ID: 34252990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact force and catheter stability are predictive metrics of successful pulmonary vein isolation with high-power short duration ablation in atrial fibrillation.
Honarbakhsh S; Martin CA; Dhillon G; Gallagher M; Sohal M; Chow A; Ahsan S; Abbass H; Whittaker-Axon S; Lambiase PD; Davies MJ; Ginks M; Hunter RJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 May; 34(5):1141-1151. PubMed ID: 36808788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-power short-duration catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is it really a new era? Comparison between new and old radiofrequency contact force-sensing catheters.
Dello Russo A; D'Angelo L; Compagnucci P; Cipolletta L; Parisi Q; Valeri Y; Campanelli F; Volpato G; Carboni L; Ciliberti G; Stronati GE; Barbarossa A; La Piscopia V; Bondavalli B; Guerra F; Natale A; Casella M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Apr; 67(3):549-557. PubMed ID: 37584862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation guided by the ablation index.
Sousa PA; Puga L; Barra S; Adão L; Primo J; Khoueiry Z; Lebreiro A; Fonseca P; Pereira M; Lagrange P; d'Avila A; Oliveiros B; Elvas L; Gonçalves L
Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 370():209-214. PubMed ID: 36228764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute oesophageal safety of high-power short duration with 50 W for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Müller J; Berkovitz A; Halbfass P; Nentwich K; Ene E; Sonne K; Simu G; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Behnes M; Akin I; Deneke T
Europace; 2022 Jul; 24(6):928-937. PubMed ID: 35134155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ravi V; Poudyal A; Abid QU; Larsen T; Krishnan K; Sharma PS; Trohman RG; Huang HD
Europace; 2021 May; 23(5):710-721. PubMed ID: 33523184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation-50 W or 90 W?
Mueller J; Nentwich K; Ene E; Berkovitz A; Sonne K; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Behnes M; Akin I; Halbfass P; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Dec; 33(12):2504-2513. PubMed ID: 36124396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconnection patterns after CLOSE-guided 50 W high-power-short-duration circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification-PV reconnection might no longer be an issue.
Francke A; Scharfe F; Schoen S; Wunderlich C; Christoph M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 35118734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of lesion characteristics between conventional and high-power short-duration ablation using contact force-sensing catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Chen CC; Lee PT; Van Ba V; Chuang CM; Lin YJ; Lo LW; Hu YF; Chung FP; Lin CY; Chang TY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Liu CM; Wu CI; Lugtu IC; Jain A; Chang SL; Chen SA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Aug; 21(1):387. PubMed ID: 34372779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Esophageal safety in CLOSE-guided 50 W high-power-short-duration pulmonary vein isolation: The PREHEAT-PVI-registry.
Francke A; Naumann G; Weidauer MC; Scharfe F; Schoen S; Wunderlich C; Christoph M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Nov; 33(11):2276-2284. PubMed ID: 35979645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using ablation index-guided high-power technique: Frankfurt AI high-power 15-month follow-up.
Chen S; Schmidt B; Bordignon S; Tohoku S; Urban VC; Schulte-Hahn B; Chun KRJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):616-624. PubMed ID: 33484215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-Power Short-Duration Lesion Index-Guided Posterior Wall Isolation beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Conti S; Sabatino F; Fortunato F; Ferrara G; Cascino A; Sgarito G
J Clin Med; 2023 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 37629269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and Efficacy of High Power Shorter Duration Ablation Guided by Ablation Index or Lesion Size Index in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Liu X; Gui C; Wen W; He Y; Dai W; Zhong G
J Interv Cardiol; 2021; 2021():5591590. PubMed ID: 34149322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation.
Junarta J; Dikdan SJ; Upadhyay N; Bodempudi S; Shvili MY; Frisch DR
Heart Vessels; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 34846561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and safety of high-power short duration atrial fibrillation ablation in elderly patients.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Lüsebrink U; Behnes M; Akin I; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 35441414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
