These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36105906)

  • 1. Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Problems and Solutions.
    Kamio T; Onda T
    Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e28906. PubMed ID: 36105906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utilizing a low-cost desktop 3D printer to develop a "one-stop 3D printing lab" for oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry fields.
    Kamio T; Hayashi K; Onda T; Takaki T; Shibahara T; Yakushiji T; Shibui T; Kato H
    3D Print Med; 2018 Dec; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 30148203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additive Manufacturing of Anatomical Models from Computed Tomography Scan Data.
    Gür Y
    Mol Cell Biomech; 2014 Dec; 11(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 26336695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating and Comparing Flexure Strength of Dental Models Printed Using Fused Deposition Modelling, Digital Light Processing, and Stereolithography Apparatus Printers.
    Atwal N; Bhatnagar D
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54312. PubMed ID: 38496206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From 3D imaging to 3D printing in dentistry - a practical guide.
    Moser N; Santander P; Quast A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(4):345-356. PubMed ID: 30539177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of desktop versus professional 3D printers for maxillofacial model production. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Jacobs R
    J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103741. PubMed ID: 34224792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Materials Used for 3D-Printing Temporal Bone Models to Simulate Surgical Dissection.
    McMillan A; Kocharyan A; Dekker SE; Kikano EG; Garg A; Huang VW; Moon N; Cooke M; Mowry SE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Dec; 129(12):1168-1173. PubMed ID: 32363889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterisation of fused deposition modeling 3D printers for pharmaceutical and medical applications.
    Feuerbach T; Kock S; Thommes M
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2018 Dec; 23(10):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 29938558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional printing: technologies, applications, and limitations in neurosurgery.
    Pucci JU; Christophe BR; Sisti JA; Connolly ES
    Biotechnol Adv; 2017 Sep; 35(5):521-529. PubMed ID: 28552791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trueness of five different 3D printing systems including budget- and professional-grade printers: An In vitro study.
    Palaszkó D; Németh A; Török G; Vecsei B; Vánkos B; Dinya E; Borbély J; Marada G; Hermann P; Kispélyi B
    Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26874. PubMed ID: 38468926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematization of Steps for Printing 3D Models of Orthopedic Deformities.
    Pontes MDS; Ramos CH; Cunha LAMD
    Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2024 Aug; 59(4):e626-e631. PubMed ID: 39239589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Streamlined, Inexpensive 3D Printing of the Brain and Skull.
    Naftulin JS; Kimchi EY; Cash SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136198. PubMed ID: 26295459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strength of PLA Components Fabricated with Fused Deposition Technology Using a Desktop 3D Printer as a Function of Geometrical Parameters of the Process.
    Kuznetsov VE; Solonin AN; Urzhumtsev OD; Schilling R; Tavitov AG
    Polymers (Basel); 2018 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30966348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation into the use of polymer blends to improve the printability of and regulate drug release from pharmaceutical solid dispersions prepared via fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing.
    Alhijjaj M; Belton P; Qi S
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2016 Nov; 108():111-125. PubMed ID: 27594210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a personalized and realistic educational thyroid cancer phantom based on CT images: An evaluation of accuracy between three different 3D printers.
    Hong D; Lee S; Kim T; Baek JH; Lee YM; Chung KW; Sung TY; Kim N
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Oct; 113():103393. PubMed ID: 31445227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orientation Planning in the Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing of Anatomical Spine Models.
    Damon A; Clifton W; Valero-Moreno F; Nottmeier E
    Cureus; 2020 Feb; 12(2):e7081. PubMed ID: 32226682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of medical models made by consumer-grade fused deposition modelling printers.
    Petropolis C; Kozan D; Sigurdson L
    Plast Surg (Oakv); 2015; 23(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 26090349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of maxillofacial prototypes fabricated by different 3-dimensional printing technologies using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yousefi F; Shokri A; Farhadian M; Vafaei F; Forutan F
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 33828960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Reconstruction assisted by 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery].
    Ernoult C; Bouletreau P; Meyer C; Aubry S; Breton P; Bachelet JT
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2015 Apr; 116(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 25742704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of Commercial 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Printer for Extrusion Printing of Hydrogels.
    Koltsov SI; Statsenko TG; Morozova SM
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 36559906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.