These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36106287)

  • 1. Comparison of Antero-Posterior Lip Position in Most Favored Facial Profile of Jaipur Population.
    Sharma K; Trehan M; Singh S; Mahlawat H; Kenkare P; Jayavarma S A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27774. PubMed ID: 36106287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15898368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antero-posterior and vertical facial type variations influence the aesthetic preference of the antero-posterior lip positions.
    Murakami T; Kataoka T; Tagawa J; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 26453593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of chin prominence on anterior-posterior lip positions of facial profile].
    Su YY; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Li H
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Dec; 17(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 19148446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of facial convexity on facial attractiveness in Japanese.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 17973684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people.
    Ioi H; Shimomura T; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 18929266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Experimental Study on Esthetic Preference and Satisfaction of Lip Position with Various Facial Divergences among the South Indian Population.
    Kumar AA; Mithun EK; Kumar S; Divakar G; Sekar S; Nagarajan S
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S156-S159. PubMed ID: 36110621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of lip profile preferences in Pakistani population; and its comparison with orthodontic norms.
    Mansoor HB; Khalid Z; Jan A; Zaheer R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Mar; 72(3):440-443. PubMed ID: 35320221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.
    Salehi P; Azadeh N; Beigi N; Farzin M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2019 Mar; 20(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 30937332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.
    Oh JH; Park JH; Cho HJ; Seo HY; Chae JM
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of vertical positions of anterior teeth on smile esthetics in Japanese and korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Aug; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 23910186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16102405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.