BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36107365)

  • 1. Improved GSimp: A Flexible Missing Value Imputation Method to Support Regulatory Bioequivalence Assessment.
    Wang J; Gong X; Hu M; Zhao L
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):163-173. PubMed ID: 36107365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GSimp: A Gibbs sampler based left-censored missing value imputation approach for metabolomics studies.
    Wei R; Wang J; Jia E; Chen T; Ni Y; Jia W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005973. PubMed ID: 29385130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left-Censored Missing Value Imputation Approach for MS-Based Proteomics Data with GSimp.
    Wei R; Wang J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2426():119-129. PubMed ID: 36308687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missing Value Imputation Approach for Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics Data.
    Wei R; Wang J; Su M; Jia E; Chen S; Chen T; Ni Y
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):663. PubMed ID: 29330539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Random forest-based imputation outperforms other methods for imputing LC-MS metabolomics data: a comparative study.
    Kokla M; Virtanen J; Kolehmainen M; Paananen J; Hanhineva K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):492. PubMed ID: 31601178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missing value imputation in proximity extension assay-based targeted proteomics data.
    Lenz M; Schulz A; Koeck T; Rapp S; Nagler M; Sauer M; Eggebrecht L; Ten Cate V; Panova-Noeva M; Prochaska JH; Lackner KJ; Münzel T; Leineweber K; Wild PS; Andrade-Navarro MA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243487. PubMed ID: 33315883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced methods for missing values imputation based on similarity learning.
    Fouad KM; Ismail MM; Azar AT; Arafa MM
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e619. PubMed ID: 34395861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanism-aware imputation: a two-step approach in handling missing values in metabolomics.
    Dekermanjian JP; Shaddox E; Nandy D; Ghosh D; Kechris K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 35578165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A real data-driven simulation strategy to select an imputation method for mixed-type trait data.
    May JA; Feng Z; Adamowicz SJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e1010154. PubMed ID: 36947561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Addressing Missing Data in GC × GC Metabolomics: Identifying Missingness Type and Evaluating the Impact of Imputation Methods on Experimental Replication.
    Davis TJ; Firzli TR; Higgins Keppler EA; Richardson M; Bean HD
    Anal Chem; 2022 Aug; 94(31):10912-10920. PubMed ID: 35881554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Handling missing values in the analysis of between-hospital differences in ordinal and dichotomous outcomes: a simulation study.
    van Linschoten RCA; Amini M; van Leeuwen N; Eijkenaar F; den Hartog SJ; Nederkoorn PJ; Hofmeijer J; Emmer BJ; Postma AA; van Zwam W; Roozenbeek B; Dippel D; Lingsma HF;
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2023 Dec; 32(12):742-749. PubMed ID: 37734955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generative adversarial networks for imputing missing data for big data clinical research.
    Dong W; Fong DYT; Yoon JS; Wan EYF; Bedford LE; Tang EHM; Lam CLK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):78. PubMed ID: 33879090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ProJect: a powerful mixed-model missing value imputation method.
    Kong W; Wong BJH; Hui HWH; Lim KP; Wang Y; Wong L; Goh WWB
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jul; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 37419612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imputation of missing values in lipidomic datasets.
    Frölich N; Klose C; Widén E; Ripatti S; Gerl MJ
    Proteomics; 2024 Apr; ():e2300606. PubMed ID: 38602226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research.
    Pedersen AB; Mikkelsen EM; Cronin-Fenton D; Kristensen NR; Pham TM; Pedersen L; Petersen I
    Clin Epidemiol; 2017; 9():157-166. PubMed ID: 28352203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. missForest with feature selection using binary particle swarm optimization improves the imputation accuracy of continuous data.
    Jin H; Jung S; Won S
    Genes Genomics; 2022 Jun; 44(6):651-658. PubMed ID: 35384632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methylation data imputation performances under different representations and missingness patterns.
    Lena PD; Sala C; Prodi A; Nardini C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):268. PubMed ID: 32600298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of evaluating missing value imputation methods in label-free proteomics.
    Jin L; Bi Y; Hu C; Qu J; Shen S; Wang X; Tian Y
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1760. PubMed ID: 33469060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputation by feature importance (IBFI): A methodology to envelop machine learning method for imputing missing patterns in time series data.
    Mir AA; Kearfott KJ; Çelebi FV; Rafique M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262131. PubMed ID: 35025953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors.
    Galimard JE; Chevret S; Curis E; Resche-Rigon M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 30170561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.