185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36107665)
1. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency.
Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.
Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2080-2097. PubMed ID: 30688477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
Failing M; Theeuwes J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability.
Valsecchi M; Turatto M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):649-666. PubMed ID: 35851440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.
Goschy H; Bakos S; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1195. PubMed ID: 25414676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages.
Qiu N; Zhang B; Allenmark F; Nasemann J; Tsai SY; Müller HJ; Shi Z
Psychophysiology; 2023 Oct; 60(10):e14351. PubMed ID: 37277926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical Learning of Frequent Distractor Locations in Visual Search Involves Regional Signal Suppression in Early Visual Cortex.
Zhang B; Weidner R; Allenmark F; Bertleff S; Fink GR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
Cereb Cortex; 2022 Jun; 32(13):2729-2744. PubMed ID: 34727169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Habituation to onsets is controlled by spatially selective distractor expectation.
Turatto M; Valsecchi M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 36395053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learned spatial suppression is not always proactive.
Chang S; Dube B; Golomb JD; Leber AB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1031-1041. PubMed ID: 37199949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
Jagini KK; Sunny MM
Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
