These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36107665)

  • 21. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning.
    Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations.
    Yu H; Allenmark F; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 May; 49(5):709-724. PubMed ID: 37261775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is perceptual learning always better at task-relevant locations? It depends on the distractors.
    Singhal I; Srinivasan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):992-1003. PubMed ID: 35217980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical Learning of Distractor Suppression Downregulates Prestimulus Neural Excitability in Early Visual Cortex.
    Ferrante O; Zhigalov A; Hickey C; Jensen O
    J Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 43(12):2190-2198. PubMed ID: 36801825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distractor ignoring is as effective as target enhancement when incidentally learned but not when explicitly cued.
    Addleman DA; Störmer VS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):834-844. PubMed ID: 36229632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing": Retraction.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Rosenbaum GM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jul; 48(7):782. PubMed ID: 35679190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional suppression in time and space.
    Xu Z; Los SA; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 34516212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.
    Tseng CH; Jingling L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124190. PubMed ID: 25909986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of prevalence on distractor speeded search termination.
    Lui L; Pratt J; Lawrence RK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):303-311. PubMed ID: 37580452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical learning in visual search reflects distractor rarity, not only attentional suppression.
    Kerzel D; Balbiani C; Rosa S; Huynh Cong S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1890-1897. PubMed ID: 35445289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical learning of distractor locations is dependent on task context.
    de Waard J; van Moorselaar D; Bogaerts L; Theeuwes J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11234. PubMed ID: 37433849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring.
    Kim A; Anderson B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 35112310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does it help to expect distraction? Attentional capture is attenuated by high distractor frequency but not by trial-to-trial predictability.
    Bogaerts L; van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):246-261. PubMed ID: 35130015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
    Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A saliency-specific and dimension-independent mechanism of distractor suppression.
    Gong D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 33025466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.