115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36108270)
1. EISA-Score: Element Interactive Surface Area Score for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
Rana MM; Nguyen DD
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Sep; 62(18):4329-4341. PubMed ID: 36108270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Persistent spectral hypergraph based machine learning (PSH-ML) for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
Liu X; Feng H; Wu J; Xia K
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33837771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dowker complex based machine learning (DCML) models for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
Liu X; Feng H; Wu J; Xia K
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Apr; 18(4):e1009943. PubMed ID: 35385478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structural and Sequence Similarity Makes a Significant Impact on Machine-Learning-Based Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Interactions.
Li Y; Yang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):1007-1012. PubMed ID: 28358210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geometric graph learning with extended atom-types features for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
Rana MM; Nguyen DD
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 164():107250. PubMed ID: 37515872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning from the ligand: using ligand-based features to improve binding affinity prediction.
Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(3):758-764. PubMed ID: 31598630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ET-score: Improving Protein-ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance-weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm.
Rayka M; Karimi-Jafari MH; Firouzi R
Mol Inform; 2021 Aug; 40(8):e2060084. PubMed ID: 34021703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Persistent Path-Spectral (PPS) Based Machine Learning for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
Liu R; Liu X; Wu J
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Feb; 63(3):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 36647267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.
Ballester PJ; Mitchell JB
Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(9):1169-75. PubMed ID: 20236947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PharmRF: A machine-learning scoring function to identify the best protein-ligand complexes for structure-based pharmacophore screening with high enrichments.
Kumar SP; Dixit NY; Patel CN; Rawal RM; Pandya HA
J Comput Chem; 2022 May; 43(12):847-863. PubMed ID: 35301752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 26357221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computationally predicting binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes: free energy-based simulations and machine learning-based scoring functions.
Wang DD; Zhu M; Yan H
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32591817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction model based on graph attention network.
Yuan H; Huang J; Li J
Math Biosci Eng; 2021 Oct; 18(6):9148-9162. PubMed ID: 34814340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonparametric chemical descriptors for the calculation of ligand-biopolymer affinities with machine-learning scoring functions.
Moman E; Grishina MA; Potemkin VA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Nov; 33(11):943-953. PubMed ID: 31728812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions.
Li GB; Yang LL; Wang WJ; Li LL; Yang SY
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23394072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN-based Multi-body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI-score) Based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein-ligand Complexes.
Khashan R; Tropsha A; Zheng W
Mol Inform; 2022 Aug; 41(8):e2100248. PubMed ID: 35142086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
