These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36108423)

  • 21. DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe.
    Ashley AK; Shrivastav M; Nie J; Amerin C; Troksa K; Glanzer JG; Liu S; Opiyo SO; Dimitrova DD; Le P; Sishc B; Bailey SM; Oakley GG; Nickoloff JA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2014 Sep; 21():131-9. PubMed ID: 24819595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Szyjka SJ; Aparicio JG; Viggiani CJ; Knott S; Xu W; Tavaré S; Aparicio OM
    Genes Dev; 2008 Jul; 22(14):1906-20. PubMed ID: 18628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing.
    Lucca C; Vanoli F; Cotta-Ramusino C; Pellicioli A; Liberi G; Haber J; Foiani M
    Oncogene; 2004 Feb; 23(6):1206-13. PubMed ID: 14647447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells.
    Cotta-Ramusino C; Fachinetti D; Lucca C; Doksani Y; Lopes M; Sogo J; Foiani M
    Mol Cell; 2005 Jan; 17(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 15629726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.
    Kondratick CM; Washington MT; Spies M
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2021 May; 113():27-37. PubMed ID: 33967572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1.
    Noguchi E; Noguchi C; Du LL; Russell P
    Mol Cell Biol; 2003 Nov; 23(21):7861-74. PubMed ID: 14560029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A local ATR-dependent checkpoint pathway is activated by a site-specific replication fork block in human cells.
    Ahmed-Seghir S; Jalan M; Grimsley HE; Sharma A; Twayana S; Kosiyatrakul ST; Thompson C; Schildkraut CL; Powell SN
    Elife; 2023 Aug; 12():. PubMed ID: 37647215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks.
    Fugger K; Mistrik M; Neelsen KJ; Yao Q; Zellweger R; Kousholt AN; Haahr P; Chu WK; Bartek J; Lopes M; Hickson ID; Sørensen CS
    Cell Rep; 2015 Mar; 10(10):1749-1757. PubMed ID: 25772361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Intra-S Checkpoint Responses to DNA Damage.
    Iyer DR; Rhind N
    Genes (Basel); 2017 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 28218681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Checkpoint responses to replication stalling: inducing tolerance and preventing mutagenesis.
    Kai M; Wang TS
    Mutat Res; 2003 Nov; 532(1-2):59-73. PubMed ID: 14643429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Termination of Replication Stress Signaling via Concerted Action of the Slx4 Scaffold and the PP4 Phosphatase.
    Jablonowski CM; Cussiol JR; Oberly S; Yimit A; Balint A; Kim T; Zhang Z; Brown GW; Smolka MB
    Genetics; 2015 Nov; 201(3):937-49. PubMed ID: 26362319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Replication fork stalling elicits chromatin compaction for the stability of stalling replication forks.
    Feng G; Yuan Y; Li Z; Wang L; Zhang B; Luo J; Ji J; Kong D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(29):14563-14572. PubMed ID: 31262821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DNA replication and damage checkpoints and meiotic cell cycle controls in the fission and budding yeasts.
    Murakami H; Nurse P
    Biochem J; 2000 Jul; 349(Pt 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10861204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Replication Checkpoint Prevents Two Types of Fork Collapse without Regulating Replisome Stability.
    Dungrawala H; Rose KL; Bhat KP; Mohni KN; Glick GG; Couch FB; Cortez D
    Mol Cell; 2015 Sep; 59(6):998-1010. PubMed ID: 26365379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases.
    De Piccoli G; Katou Y; Itoh T; Nakato R; Shirahige K; Labib K
    Mol Cell; 2012 Mar; 45(5):696-704. PubMed ID: 22325992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity.
    Cortez D
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Aug; 32():149-157. PubMed ID: 25957489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability.
    Errico A; Costanzo V
    Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2012; 47(3):222-35. PubMed ID: 22324461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
    Lambert S; Carr AM
    Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Slx4-Dpb11 scaffold complex: coordinating the response to replication fork stalling in S-phase and the subsequent mitosis.
    Princz LN; Gritenaite D; Pfander B
    Cell Cycle; 2015; 14(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 25496009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The fork and the kinase: a DNA replication tale from a CHK1 perspective.
    González Besteiro MA; Gottifredi V
    Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2015; 763():168-80. PubMed ID: 25795119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.