These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36108478)
1. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening. Coffey K; Jochelson MS Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art. Jochelson MS; Lobbes MBI Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 33650905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer. Nissan N; Comstock CE; Sevilimedu V; Gluskin J; Mango VL; Hughes M; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Sung JS; Jochelson MS Radiology; 2024 Oct; 313(1):e232580. PubMed ID: 39352285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening. Covington MF Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study. Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening. Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment. Ontario Health (Quality) Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2023; 23(9):1-293. PubMed ID: 39364436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Shahraki Z; Ghaffari M; Nakhaie Moghadam M; Parooie F; Salarzaei M Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 35754256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare. Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Miller MM; Mayorov S; Ganti R; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Caley M; Jahjah J; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA; Rooney TB J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38537570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Açar ÇR; Orguc S Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Aug; 24(6):481-493. PubMed ID: 38777678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions. Ghaderi KF; Phillips J; Perry H; Lotfi P; Mehta TS Radiographics; 2019; 39(7):1907-1920. PubMed ID: 31697627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient perspectives on repeated contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic resonance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Pires-Gonçalves L; Henriques Abreu M; Ferrão A; Guimarães Dos Santos A; Aguiar AT; Gouvêa M; Henrique R Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 36575580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer]. Fischer U; Diekmann F; Helbich T; Preibsch H; Püsken M; Wenkel E; Wienbeck S; Fallenberg EM Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 63(12):916-924. PubMed ID: 37889284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study. Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges. van Nijnatten TJA; Morscheid S; Baltzer PAT; Clauser P; Alcantara R; Kuhl CK; Wildberger JE Eur J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 171():111312. PubMed ID: 38237520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]