142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36108534)
1. Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Granulomatous and Nongranulomatous Mastitis.
Mohindra N; Jain N; Sabaretnam M; Agrawal V; Mishra P; Chaturvedi P; Mishra A; Agarwal G
J Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 281():13-21. PubMed ID: 36108534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic images in patients with breast cancer.
Bahadir H
Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1444-1448. PubMed ID: 37929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Digital Mammography in Lesion Characterization in Breast Cancer Patients.
Mohindra N; Neyaz Z; Agrawal V; Agarwal G; Mishra P
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2018; 8(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 29552533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging.
Mackenzie A; Thomson EL; Mitchell M; Elangovan P; van Ongeval C; Cockmartin L; Warren LM; Wilkinson LS; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM; Dance DR; Young KC
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):806-814. PubMed ID: 34331118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Upgraded BIRADS Scoring towards the True Pathology of Lesions Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Grubstein A; Friehmann T; Dahan M; Abitbol C; Gadiel I; Schejtman DM; Shochat T; Atar E; Tamir S
Tomography; 2024 May; 10(5):806-815. PubMed ID: 38787021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography.
Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; López JE; Hernandez AM; Gazi P; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
Br J Radiol; 2019 May; 92(1097):20181034. PubMed ID: 30810339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.
Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Adding Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to BI-RADS Categorization of Mammographically Equivocal Breast Lesions.
Hassan RM; Almalki YE; Basha MAA; Alduraibi SK; Aboualkheir M; Almushayti ZA; Aldhilan AS; Aly SA; Alshamy AA
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37189524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic features and screening outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Hoff SR; Holen ÅS; Haldorsen IS; Hovda T; Hanestad B; Sandvik CK; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109753. PubMed ID: 34053786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
