BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36108821)

  • 1. Acromioclavicular joint separation: Retrospective study of non-operative and surgical treatment in 38 patients with grade III or higher injuries and a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
    Saade F; Carminati F; Bouteille C; Lustig JP; El Rifaï S; Boyer E; Obert L; Loisel F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Jun; 109(4):103405. PubMed ID: 36108821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.
    Feichtinger X; Dahm F; Schallmayer D; Boesmueller S; Fialka C; Mittermayr R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 32748232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Boström Windhamre H; von Heideken J; Une-Larsson V; Ekström W; Ekelund A
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1122-1136. PubMed ID: 35007749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.
    Cerciello S; Corona K; Morris BJ; Proietti L; Mercurio M; Cattaneo S; Milano G
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Jun; 30(6):2084-2091. PubMed ID: 34841469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries: quality of life comparison between patients managed operatively with a hook plate versus patients managed non-operatively.
    Natera Cisneros LG; Sarasquete Reiriz J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Apr; 27(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 27734220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A relook at the reliability of Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries.
    Lau ETC; Hong CC; Poh KS; Manohara R; Ng DZ; Lim JL; Kumar VP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Sep; 30(9):2191-2196. PubMed ID: 33582181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study on the treatment of Rockwood type III acute acromioclavicular dislocation: Clinical results from the TightRope
    Horst K; Garving C; Thometzki T; Lichte P; Knobe M; Dienstknecht T; Hofman M; Pape HC
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 103(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 27940250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of radiographic measurements for acromioclavicular joint separations.
    Gastaud O; Raynier JL; Duparc F; Baverel L; Andrieu K; Tarissi N; Barth J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8 Suppl):S291-5. PubMed ID: 26548513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is coracoclavicular stabilisation alone sufficient for the endoscopic treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types III, IV, and V)?
    Barth J; Duparc F; Andrieu K; Duport M; Toussaint B; Bertiaux S; Clavert P; Gastaud O; Brassart N; Beaudouin E; De Mourgues P; Berne D; Bahurel J; Najihi N; Boyer P; Faivre B; Meyer A; Nourissat G; Poulain S; Bruchou F; Ménard JF;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8 Suppl):S297-303. PubMed ID: 26514849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is AC TightRope fixation better than Bosworth screw fixation for minimally invasive operative treatment of Rockwood III AC joint injury?
    Darabos N; Vlahovic I; Gusic N; Darabos A; Bakota B; Miklic D
    Injury; 2015 Nov; 46 Suppl 6():S113-8. PubMed ID: 26632500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non-operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries.
    Muench LN; Berthold DP; Uyeki C; Kia C; Cote MP; Imhoff AB; Beitzel K; Corona K; Mazzocca AD; Cerciello S
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2264-2271. PubMed ID: 32710143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Yin J; Yin Z; Gong G; Zhu C; Sun C; Liu X
    Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):18-23. PubMed ID: 29679723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results.
    Çarkçı E; Polat AE; Gürpınar T
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Apr; 15(1):136. PubMed ID: 32268914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double button device: Clinical and MRI results.
    Loriaut P; Casabianca L; Alkhaili J; Dallaudière B; Desportes E; Rousseau R; Massin P; Boyer P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 26545942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modified single-endobutton technique combined with nice knot for treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
    Hu F; Han S; Liu F; Wang Z; Jia H; Wang F; Hu L; Chen J; Wang B; Yang Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):15. PubMed ID: 34980065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic factors to succeed in surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocations.
    Barth J; Duparc F; Baverel L; Bahurel J; Toussaint B; Bertiaux S; Clavert P; Gastaud O; Brassart N; Beaudouin E; De Mourgues P; Berne D; Duport M; Najihi N; Boyer P; Faivre B; Meyer A; Nourissat G; Poulain S; Bruchou F; Ménard JF;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8 Suppl):S305-11. PubMed ID: 26470802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Arthroscopic stabilisation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TighRope device].
    Bajnar L; Bartoš R; Sedivý P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(6):386-90. PubMed ID: 24750965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
    Schneider MM; Balke M; Koenen P; Fröhlich M; Wafaisade A; Bouillon B; Banerjee M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jul; 24(7):2192-6. PubMed ID: 25399347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with Bosworth screw and additional K-wiring: results after 7.8 years - still an adequate procedure?
    Tiefenboeck TM; Popp D; Boesmueller S; Payr S; Joestl J; Komjati M; Binder H; Schurz M; Ostermann RC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):339. PubMed ID: 28778193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of Tension Banding and Modified Orthocord Sling in Acromioclavicular Dislocation Treatment - Non-Randomized Retrospective Study].
    Trávník J; Kovařík J; Pavlacký T; Veselý R; Pink T; Paša L
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 31070572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.