These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36109239)

  • 1. Leveraging the sampling efficiency of RE-EDS in OpenMM using a shifted reaction-field with an atom-based cutoff.
    Rieder SR; Ries B; Kubincová A; Champion C; Barros EP; Hünenberger PH; Riniker S
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Sep; 157(10):104117. PubMed ID: 36109239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling Using Generalized AMBER Force-Field Topologies: Application to Relative Hydration Free-Energy Calculations for Large Sets of Molecules.
    Rieder SR; Ries B; Schaller K; Champion C; Barros EP; Hünenberger PH; Riniker S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(12):3043-3056. PubMed ID: 35675713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.
    Rocklin GJ; Mobley DL; Dill KA; Hünenberger PH
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(18):184103. PubMed ID: 24320250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Net charge changes in the calculation of relative ligand-binding free energies via classical atomistic molecular dynamics simulation.
    Reif MM; Oostenbrink C
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Jan; 35(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 24249099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Replica exchange enveloping distribution sampling (RE-EDS): A robust method to estimate multiple free-energy differences from a single simulation.
    Sidler D; Schwaninger A; Riniker S
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Oct; 145(15):154114. PubMed ID: 27782485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient Round-Trip Time Optimization for Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling (RE-EDS).
    Sidler D; Cristòfol-Clough M; Riniker S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jun; 13(6):3020-3030. PubMed ID: 28510459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling: Calculation of Relative Free Energies in GROMOS.
    Rieder SR; Ries B; Champion C; Barros EP; Hünenberger PH; Riniker S
    Chimia (Aarau); 2022 Apr; 76(4):327-330. PubMed ID: 38069773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correcting electrostatic artifacts due to net-charge changes in the calculation of ligand binding free energies.
    Öhlknecht C; Lier B; Petrov D; Fuchs J; Oostenbrink C
    J Comput Chem; 2020 Apr; 41(10):986-999. PubMed ID: 31930547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partition coefficients of methylated DNA bases obtained from free energy calculations with molecular electron density derived atomic charges.
    Lara A; Riquelme M; Vöhringer-Martinez E
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Aug; 39(22):1728-1737. PubMed ID: 29752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reaction-field electrostatics in molecular dynamics simulations: development of a conservative scheme compatible with an atomic cutoff.
    Kubincová A; Riniker S; Hünenberger PH
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2020 Nov; 22(45):26419-26437. PubMed ID: 33180085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Using Single Atomistic Long-Range Cutoff Schemes with the GROMOS 54A7 Force Field.
    Silva TFD; Vila-Viçosa D; Reis PBPS; Victor BL; Diem M; Oostenbrink C; Machuqueiro M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Nov; 14(11):5823-5833. PubMed ID: 30354115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining the lattice-sum and reaction-field approaches for evaluating long-range electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations.
    Heinz TN; Hünenberger PH
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Jul; 123(3):34107. PubMed ID: 16080730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative free-energy calculations for scaffold hopping-type transformations with an automated RE-EDS sampling procedure.
    Ries B; Normak K; Weiß RG; Rieder S; Barros EP; Champion C; König G; Riniker S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Feb; 36(2):117-130. PubMed ID: 34978000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cutoff size need not strongly influence molecular dynamics results for solvated polypeptides.
    Beck DA; Armen RS; Daggett V
    Biochemistry; 2005 Jan; 44(2):609-16. PubMed ID: 15641786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple and accurate scheme to compute electrostatic interaction: zero-dipole summation technique for molecular system and application to bulk water.
    Fukuda I; Kamiya N; Yonezawa Y; Nakamura H
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Aug; 137(5):054314. PubMed ID: 22894355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accelerating Alchemical Free Energy Prediction Using a Multistate Method: Application to Multiple Kinases.
    Champion C; Gall R; Ries B; Rieder SR; Barros EP; Riniker S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Nov; 63(22):7133-7147. PubMed ID: 37948537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coulomb replica-exchange method: handling electrostatic attractive and repulsive forces for biomolecules.
    Itoh SG; Okumura H
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Mar; 34(8):622-39. PubMed ID: 23197415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient Strategy for the Calculation of Solvation Free Energies in Water and Chloroform at the Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Level.
    Wang M; Li P; Jia X; Liu W; Shao Y; Hu W; Zheng J; Brooks BR; Mei Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Oct; 57(10):2476-2489. PubMed ID: 28933850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using enveloping distribution sampling to compute the free enthalpy difference between right- and left-handed helices of a β-peptide in solution.
    Lin Z; Timmerscheidt TA; van Gunsteren WF
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Aug; 137(6):064108. PubMed ID: 22897256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomolecular force fields: where have we been, where are we now, where do we need to go and how do we get there?
    Dauber-Osguthorpe P; Hagler AT
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Feb; 33(2):133-203. PubMed ID: 30506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.