These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36109373)

  • 1. The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid-based in vitro study.
    Schlenz MA; Klaus K; Schmidt A; Wöstmann B; Mersmann M; Ruf S; Bock NC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):273-283. PubMed ID: 36109373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What to Prefer in Patients with Multibracket Appliances? Digital vs. Conventional Full-Arch Impressions-A Reference Aid-Based In Vivo Study.
    Bock NC; Klaus K; Liebel MM; Ruf S; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    J Clin Med; 2023 Apr; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 37176511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study.
    El Osta N; Drancourt N; Auduc C; Veyrune JL; Nicolas E
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104892. PubMed ID: 38367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
    Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces.
    Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
    Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria.
    Róth I; Czigola A; Fehér D; Vitai V; Joós-Kovács GL; Hermann P; Borbély J; Vecsei B
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):140. PubMed ID: 35473932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of generation change on the accuracy of full arch digital impressions.
    Schmalzl J; Róth I; Borbély J; Hermann P; Vecsei B
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):766. PubMed ID: 37853398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An
    Shaikh M; Lakha T; Kheur S; Qamri B; Kheur M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 36511075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.
    Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Lerner H; Rutkunas V; Mangano C
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):263. PubMed ID: 32962680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of seven intraoral scanners for the full dentate and partially edentulous complete-arch mandibular casts: An
    Wang X; Zhang F; Ma D; Ye X; Zheng X; Ren R; Ren N; Bai S
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31063. PubMed ID: 38803930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of the Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners in Mandibular Full-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Di Fiore A; Graiff L; Savio G; Granata S; Basilicata M; Bollero P; Meneghello R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(8):. PubMed ID: 35457583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance.
    Atieh MA; Ritter AV; Ko CC; Duqum I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 28222869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.