These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3610989)
1. Disruptive effects of auditory signal delay on speech perception with lipreading. Pandey PC; Kunov H; Abel SM J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 3610989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeing to hear better: evidence for early audio-visual interactions in speech identification. Schwartz JL; Berthommier F; Savariaux C Cognition; 2004 Sep; 93(2):B69-78. PubMed ID: 15147940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory versus visual practice effects in the intelligibility of words in everyday sentences. Squires SC; Dancer JE J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 3610991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Summerfield Q Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jan; 335(1273):71-8. PubMed ID: 1348140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives. Wang Y; Behne DM; Jiang H J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1716-26. PubMed ID: 19045662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tolerable hearing aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay. Stone MA; Moore BC Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 12677113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audio-visual matching of speech and non-speech oral gestures in patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Schmid G; Ziegler W Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):546-55. PubMed ID: 16129459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech. Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermodal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults. McGrath M; Summerfield Q J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):678-85. PubMed ID: 3973239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf. Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects. Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test. Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot experiment on the effects of an acoustically applied reduced speech signal on speechreading. Coninx F; Vermuelen A; Zierhofer C Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():136-44. PubMed ID: 8153559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]