These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36110678)

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars -
    Thomas JM; Bhat SS; Amutha Prabha AE; Harris A; Rinu K; Mohan AP
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S78-S81. PubMed ID: 36110678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage and Micrographic Evaluation of Composite Restorations with Various Bases over ZOE Layer in Pulpotomized Primary Molars.
    Bargrizan M; Mirkarimi M; Rezamand M; Eskandarion S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2011; 8(4):178-85. PubMed ID: 22509457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars.
    Guelmann M; Bookmyer KL; Villalta P; García-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 15871455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of microleakage from stainless steel crowns margins used with different restorative materials: An in vitro study.
    Memarpour M; Derafshi R; Razavi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 26962309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study.
    Hallett KB; Garcia-Godoy F
    Dent Mater; 1993 Sep; 9(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 7995482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro and clinical outcome of sandwich restorations with a bulk-fill flowable composite liner for pulpotomized primary teeth.
    Cantekin K; Gumus H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 25571688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Microleakage Evaluation through the Interfaces between the Tooth and Cement after Stainless Steel Crown Cementation in Primary Molars: An
    Gundewar MS; Saha S; Arora D; Dhinsa K; Tiwari S; Tripathi AM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):159-163. PubMed ID: 37457215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Bioactive, Ormocer, and Conventional GIC Restorative Materials in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study Microleakage of Three Restorative Materials.
    Jain K; Katge F; Poojari M; Shetty S; Patil D; Ghadge S
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():7932930. PubMed ID: 35310459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Effect of Nanographene Oxide on Microleakage of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer.
    Sharafeddin F; Ghodrati P
    Int J Dent; 2023; 2023():8853495. PubMed ID: 38021348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cement and Chitosan-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study.
    Abraham D; Thomas AM; Chopra S; Koshy S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 Jan; 7(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 25206230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Microleakage in Nanocomposite and Amalgam as a Crown Foundation Material Luted with Different Luting Cements under CAD-CAM Milled Metal Crowns: An In Vitro Microscopic Study.
    Amina ; Rajput G; Ahmed S; Chaturvedi S; Addas MK; Bhagat TV; Gurumurthy V; Alqahtani SM; Alobaid MA; Alsubaiy EF; Gupta K
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35808655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
    Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage patterns of glass ionomer cement at cement-band and cement-enamel interfaces in primary teeth.
    Shankar P; Venkatesan R; Senthil D; Trophimus J; Arthilakshmi CU; Princy P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(2):291-296. PubMed ID: 32436911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An
    Mohammad N; Pattanaik S; Reddy TB; Animireddy D; Ankireddy S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 31496563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials - An
    Singh S; Goel D; Awasthi N; Khandelwal D; Sharma A; Patil S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2021; 12(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 34759680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.