These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36110775)

  • 21. Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length.
    Yoo JS; Kwon KR; Noh K; Lee H; Paek J
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 9(3):143-151. PubMed ID: 28680544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of three attachments in implant-tissue supported overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Tabatabaian F; Alaie F; Seyedan K
    J Dent (Tehran); 2010; 7(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 21998784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Angled ball and locator attachments for immediate loaded inclined implants used to retain maxillary overdentures: A cross over study of patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life.
    Aboelez MA; Elezz MGA; Abdraboh AE; Elsyad MA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 35503746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture.
    Nassar HI; Abdelaziz MS
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):227. PubMed ID: 35681163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Posterior Mandibular Ridge Resorption Associated with Different Retentive Systems for Overdentures: A 7-Year Retrospective Preliminary Study.
    Elsyad MA; Mohamed SS; Shawky AF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):260–265. PubMed ID: 28319208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of bar cross-section and female housing material on retention of mandibular implant bar overdentures: A comparative
    Abdel-Khalek EA; Ibrahim AM
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 29249877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant-supported overdentures under biting force: An in-vitro study.
    Zhang X; Liu W; Qing H; Pei X; Chen J; Wang J
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 29989109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In Vitro Effects of Cyclic Dislodgement on Retentive Properties of Various Titanium-Based Dental Implant Overdentures Attachment System.
    Kang TY; Kim JH; Kim KM; Kwon JS
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(22):. PubMed ID: 31744164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maximum dislodging forces of mandibular implant-assisted removable partial dentures: in vitro assessment.
    Gharehchahi J; Asadzadeh N; Mirmortazavi A; Shakeri MT
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):543-549. PubMed ID: 23551954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.