These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3611129)

  • 1. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints.
    Cavanagh PR; Rodgers MM
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 3611129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic footprint measurement collection technique and intrarater reliability: ink mat, paper pedography, and electronic pedography.
    Fascione JM; Crews RT; Wrobel JS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2012; 102(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22461270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system.
    Queen RM; Mall NA; Hardaker WM; Nunley JA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 17475140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of a New Method to Determine Foot Arch Height for Clinicians.
    Charles JA; Mignot C; Jelinek HF
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2019 May; 109(3):187-192. PubMed ID: 31268787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The identification and reliability of static and dynamic barefoot impression measurements: A systematic review.
    Hu A; Arnold JB; Causby R; Jones S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():156-164. PubMed ID: 29864603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population.
    Scholz T; Zech A; Wegscheider K; Lezius S; Braumann KM; Sehner S; Hollander K
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Sep; 107(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 28708428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The arch index: a measure of flat or fat feet?
    Wearing SC; Hills AP; Byrne NM; Hennig EM; McDonald M
    Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Aug; 25(8):575-81. PubMed ID: 15363380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex estimation using anthropometry of feet and footprints in a Western Australian population.
    Hemy N; Flavel A; Ishak NI; Franklin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):402.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23806341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Vicenzino B; Teyhen DS; Molloy JM; Christie DS; Collins N
    Foot (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 18(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 20307441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity.
    Williams DS; McClay IS
    Phys Ther; 2000 Sep; 80(9):864-71. PubMed ID: 10960934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foot asymmetry in healthy adults: elliptic fourier analysis of standardized footprints.
    Sforza C; Michielon G; Fragnito N; Ferrario VF
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Nov; 16(6):758-65. PubMed ID: 9877402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of footprint indexes calculated from ink and electronic footprints.
    Urry SR; Wearing SC
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2001 Apr; 91(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 11319250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of skeletal characteristics of flat feet using three-dimensional foot scanner and digital footprint.
    Yamashita T; Yamashita K; Sato M; Kawasumi M; Ata S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2022 Aug; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 35945533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Foot arch characterization: a review, a new metric, and a comparison.
    Xiong S; Goonetilleke RS; Witana CP; Weerasinghe TW; Au EY
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2010; 100(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 20093541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of static footprints and pedobarography in obese and non-obese children.
    Taisa Filippin N; de Almeida Bacarin T; Lobo da Costa PH
    Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Nov; 29(11):1141-4. PubMed ID: 19026210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age.
    Forriol F; Pascual J
    Foot Ankle; 1990 Oct; 11(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 2265808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability of footprint ridge density and its use in estimation of sex in forensic examinations.
    Krishan K; Kanchan T; Pathania A; Sharma R; DiMaggio JA
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Oct; 55(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 25413487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Harmonic analysis of footprint symmetry in healthy adolescents.
    Sforza C; Fragnito N; Serrao G; Ferrario VF
    Ann Anat; 2000 May; 182(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 10836103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contact area of static and dynamic footprints: Forensic implications.
    Mukhra R; Krishan K; Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 33736852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between body mass index and footprint parameters in older people.
    Yousefi Azarfam AA; Ozdemir O; Altuntaş O; Cetin A; Gökçe Kutsal Y
    Foot (Edinb); 2014 Dec; 24(4):186-9. PubMed ID: 25241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.