217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36111540)
1. Effect of minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy on wound infection and postoperative and intraoperative complications in the management of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Zheng S; Liu X; Cheng L; Wu Q; Meng F
Int Wound J; 2023 Apr; 20(4):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 36111540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.
Yun Z; Li X; Zhu D; Li L; Jiang S
Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14535. PubMed ID: 38169097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size
Nasioudis D; Albright BB; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jul; 31(7):983-990. PubMed ID: 34016701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.
Chang EJ; Mandelbaum RS; Nusbaum DJ; Violette CJ; Matsushima K; Klar M; Matsuzaki S; Machida H; Kanao H; Roman LD; Matsuo K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 31743796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical site infection in women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer.
Mahdi H; Gojayev A; Buechel M; Knight J; SanMarco J; Lockhart D; Michener C; Moslemi-Kebria M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 24681712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy.
Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of body mass index on surgical site wound infection, mortality, and postoperative hospital stay in subjects undergoing possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Qiao Y; Zhang T; Bai T; Peng X; Lin H; Zhang A
Int Wound J; 2023 Jan; 20(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 35670494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
Brown J; Drury L; Crane EK; Anderson WE; Tait DL; Higgins RV; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):902-909. PubMed ID: 30240899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive surgical approach compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the feasibility and safety.
Lei P; Wei B; Guo W; Wei H
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Aug; 24(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 24743678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
