These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36111540)

  • 1. Effect of minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy on wound infection and postoperative and intraoperative complications in the management of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Zheng S; Liu X; Cheng L; Wu Q; Meng F
    Int Wound J; 2023 Apr; 20(4):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 36111540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.
    Yun Z; Li X; Zhu D; Li L; Jiang S
    Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14535. PubMed ID: 38169097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
    Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size
    Nasioudis D; Albright BB; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jul; 31(7):983-990. PubMed ID: 34016701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
    Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.
    Chang EJ; Mandelbaum RS; Nusbaum DJ; Violette CJ; Matsushima K; Klar M; Matsuzaki S; Machida H; Kanao H; Roman LD; Matsuo K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 31743796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical site infection in women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer.
    Mahdi H; Gojayev A; Buechel M; Knight J; SanMarco J; Lockhart D; Michener C; Moslemi-Kebria M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 24681712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy.
    Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of body mass index on surgical site wound infection, mortality, and postoperative hospital stay in subjects undergoing possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Qiao Y; Zhang T; Bai T; Peng X; Lin H; Zhang A
    Int Wound J; 2023 Jan; 20(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 35670494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
    Brown J; Drury L; Crane EK; Anderson WE; Tait DL; Higgins RV; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):902-909. PubMed ID: 30240899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgical approach compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the feasibility and safety.
    Lei P; Wei B; Guo W; Wei H
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Aug; 24(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 24743678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.