181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36111562)
1. High duty cycle moth sounds jam bat echolocation: bats counter with compensatory changes in buzz duration.
Fernández Y; Dowdy NJ; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2022 Sep; 225(18):. PubMed ID: 36111562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tiger moth jams bat sonar.
Corcoran AJ; Barber JR; Conner WE
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5938):325-7. PubMed ID: 19608920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How do tiger moths jam bat sonar?
Corcoran AJ; Barber JR; Hristov NI; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2011 Jul; 214(Pt 14):2416-25. PubMed ID: 21697434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tiger moth responses to a simulated bat attack: timing and duty cycle.
Barber JR; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2006 Jul; 209(Pt 14):2637-50. PubMed ID: 16809455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Jamming bat echolocation: the dogbane tiger moth Cycnia tenera times its clicks to the terminal attack calls of the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus.
Fullard JH; Simmons JA; Saillant PA
J Exp Biol; 1994 Sep; 194():285-98. PubMed ID: 7964403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Active acoustic interference elicits echolocation changes in heterospecific bats.
Jones TK; Wohlgemuth MJ; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2018 Aug; 221(Pt 15):. PubMed ID: 29950451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tiger beetles produce anti-bat ultrasound and are probable Batesian moth mimics.
Gough HM; Rubin JJ; Kawahara AY; Barber JR
Biol Lett; 2024 May; 20(5):20230610. PubMed ID: 38747686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense.
Corcoran AJ; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2012 Dec; 215(Pt 24):4278-87. PubMed ID: 23175526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural echolocation sequences evoke echo-delay selectivity in the auditory midbrain of the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus.
Macías S; Luo J; Moss CF
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Sep; 120(3):1323-1339. PubMed ID: 29924708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tempo and mode of antibat ultrasound production and sonar jamming in the diverse hawkmoth radiation.
Kawahara AY; Barber JR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May; 112(20):6407-12. PubMed ID: 25941377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race.
Hristov NI; Conner WE
Naturwissenschaften; 2005 Apr; 92(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 15772807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vocal control of acoustic information for sonar discriminations by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.
Wadsworth J; Moss CF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2265-71. PubMed ID: 10790052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.
Ratcliffe JM; Fullard JH
J Exp Biol; 2005 Dec; 208(Pt 24):4689-98. PubMed ID: 16326950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Naïve bats discriminate arctiid moth warning sounds but generalize their aposematic meaning.
Barber JR; Chadwell BA; Garrett N; Schmidt-French B; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2009 Jul; 212(Pt 14):2141-8. PubMed ID: 19561203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming.
Chiu C; Xian W; Moss CF
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Sep; 105(35):13116-21. PubMed ID: 18725624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.
Miller LA
J Comp Physiol A; 1991 May; 168(5):571-9. PubMed ID: 1920158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.
Barber JR; Plotkin D; Rubin JJ; Homziak NT; Leavell BC; Houlihan PR; Miner KA; Breinholt JW; Quirk-Royal B; Padrón PS; Nunez M; Kawahara AY
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(25):e2117485119. PubMed ID: 35704762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera.
Fullard JH; Ratcliffe JM; Christie CG
J Exp Biol; 2007 Jul; 210(Pt 14):2481-8. PubMed ID: 17601952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats.
Moss CF; Surlykke A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2207-26. PubMed ID: 11681397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.
Luo J; Moss CF
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(41):10978-10983. PubMed ID: 28973851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
