These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36112428)

  • 41. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Contour changes in human alveolar bone following tooth extraction of the maxillary central incisor.
    Li B; Wang Y
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2014 Dec; 15(12):1064-71. PubMed ID: 25471836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Correlation among alveolar bone assessments provided by CBCT, micro-CT, and 14 T MRI.
    Choi IGG; Pinhata-Baptista OH; Ferraço R; Kim JH; Abdala Júnior R; Arita ES; Cortes ARG; Ackerman JL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Jul; 51(5):20210243. PubMed ID: 35348359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Variations in bone quantity in the posterior mandible: a cross-sectional cone beam computed tomographic study.
    Safi Y; Amid R; Alizad-Rahvar M
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 34978983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of alveolar bone dimensions in unilateral palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomographic analyses.
    Tadinada A; Mahdian M; Vishwanath M; Allareddy V; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 25667038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Facial alveolar bone wall width - a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians.
    Zekry A; Wang R; Chau AC; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 23294441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of Osseointegration in Implants using Digital Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Chopra A; Mhapuskar AA; Marathe S; Nisa SU; Thopte S; Saddiwal R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):953-957. PubMed ID: 27965508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Alveolar ridge dimensional changes following ridge preservation procedure using SocketKAP(™) : exploratory study of serial cone-beam computed tomography and histologic analysis in canine model.
    Ryu KH; Min S; You HK; Sin YW; Lee W; Lee J; Kiss A; Almohaimeed M; Zadeh HH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1144-51. PubMed ID: 26660705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Improving the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Grafts With Cone Beam Computerized Tomography.
    de Moura PM; Hallac R; Kane A; Seaward J
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26101811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Diagnostic value of dental implants in the posterior maxilla using cone beam computed tomography].
    Fan LF; Pan XG; Pu YP; Lai HC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 18989602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Alveolar ridge dimensions in mandibular posterior regions: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data.
    Pramstraller M; Schincaglia GP; Vecchiatini R; Farina R; Trombelli L
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Dec; 40(12):1419-1428. PubMed ID: 30167819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative Evaluation of Ridge Width for Implant Placement Using Ridge Mapping on the Diagnostic Cast, Cone-beam Computed Tomography, and Direct Surgical Measurements.
    Choudhary SB; Asthana G; Kalsi R; Saurav K; Mishra SK; Chhina S; Peku H; Ahmad Z
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 35748448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 23064974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital method for quantification of circumferential periodontal bone level using cone beam CT.
    Fleiner J; Hannig C; Schulze D; Stricker A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 22431146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone.
    Mol A; Balasundaram A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 18757716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of posterior alveolar bone height on the height of maxillary sinus septa.
    Demirkol M; Demirkol N
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Sep; 41(9):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 31250139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Markic G; Müller L; Patcas R; Roos M; Lochbühler N; Peltomäki T; Karlo CA; Ullrich O; Kellenberger CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 25154725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.