136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36112475)
1. Transtibial prosthetic socket fitting: Australian prosthetist perspectives on primary challenges, management strategies, and opportunities for workflow and technological innovation.
Armitage L; McDonald KA; Kark L; Buller A; Ford B
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Apr; 47(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 36112475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elastomeric liners for people with transtibial amputation: Survey of prosthetists' clinical practices.
Hafner BJ; Cagle JC; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 27613589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical utility of pressure feedback to socket design and fabrication.
Armitage L; Buller A; Rajan G; Prusty G; Simmons A; Kark L
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Feb; 44(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 31769736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 2-generating person-specific candidate designs using multi-objective genetic algorithms.
Steer JW; Grudniewski PA; Browne M; Worsley PR; Sobey AJ; Dickinson AS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1347-1360. PubMed ID: 31741116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees.
Gailey R; Kristal A; Lucarevic J; Harris S; Applegate B; Gaunaurd I
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 30095355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Limited Prosthetic Socket Documentation: A Researcher Perspective.
Olsen J; Turner S; Chadwell A; Dickinson A; Ostler C; Armitage L; McGregor AH; Dupan S; Day S
Front Rehabil Sci; 2022; 3():853414. PubMed ID: 36189046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.
Brzostowski JT; Larsen BG; Youngblood RT; Ciol MA; Hafner BJ; Gurrey CJ; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30628522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the influence of cyclic loading on a laser sintered transtibial prosthetic socket using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).
Saey T; Muraru L; Raeve E; Cuppens K; Balcaen R; Creylman V
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5382-5385. PubMed ID: 31947072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scoping review to evaluate existing measurement parameters and clinical outcomes of transtibial prosthetic alignment and socket fit.
Won NY; Paul A; Garibaldi M; Baumgartner RE; Kaufman KR; Reider L; Wrigley J; Morshed S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 35412519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjustable-Volume Prosthetic Sockets: Market Overview and Value Propositions.
Klenow TD; Schulz J
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(2):35208. PubMed ID: 37615005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses through visualization of socket reaction moments.
Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Boone DA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Dec; 39(6):512-6. PubMed ID: 25121726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a direct manufacturing prosthetic socket system in a rural community in South Africa: A pilot study and lessons for future research.
Ennion L; Johannesson A; Rhoda A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):455-462. PubMed ID: 28103760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a Custom Interface Pressure Measurement System to Improve Fitting of Transtibial Prosthetic Check Sockets.
Armitage L; Cho K; Sariyildiz E; Buller A; O'Brien S; Kark L
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of elevated vacuum and suction prosthetic suspension systems in managing daily residual limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.
Youngblood RT; Brzostowski JT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Allyn KJ; Foster RL; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):155-163. PubMed ID: 32186238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of activity intensity, time, and intermittent doffing on daily limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.
Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Allyn KJ; Cagle JC; Hinrichs P; Redd C; Vamos AC; Ciol MA; Bean N; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 30010494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of alignment changes on sagittal and coronal socket reaction moment interactions in transtibial prostheses.
Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Zhang M; Boone DA
J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1343-50. PubMed ID: 23499228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Workflow for Studying the Stump-Socket Interface in Persons with Transtibial Amputation through 3D Thermographic Mapping.
Cutti AG; Morosato F; Gentile C; Gariboldi F; Hamoui G; Santi MG; Teti G; Gruppioni E
Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 37299763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding decision-making in prosthetic rehabilitation by prosthetists and people with lower limb amputation: a qualitative study.
Anderson CB; Kittelson AJ; Wurdeman SR; Miller MJ; Stoneback JW; Christiansen CL; Magnusson DM
Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 45(4):723-732. PubMed ID: 35389313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
