These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36112986)

  • 1. Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching.
    Benini E; Koch I; Mayr S; Frings C; Philipp AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Aug; 76(8):1872-1888. PubMed ID: 36112986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching.
    Benini E; Koch I; Mayr S; Frings C; Philipp AM
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):29. PubMed ID: 36072099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N-2 Repetition Costs in Task Switching: Task Inhibition or Interference Between Task Episodes?
    Schuch S; Keppler E
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 36382216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching.
    Grange JA; Kowalczyk AW; O'Loughlin R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1568-1583. PubMed ID: 28383961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binding and Retrieval of Response Durations: Subtle Evidence for Episodic Processing of Continuous Movement Features.
    Pfister R; Bogon J; Foerster A; Kunde W; Moeller B
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 36072101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why star retrieves scar: Binding and retrieval of perceptual distractor features.
    Laub R; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):350-363. PubMed ID: 31180703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further Evidence for the Binding and Retrieval of Control-States From the Flanker Task.
    Dignath D; Kiesel A
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):264-273. PubMed ID: 34911358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Salience drives non-spatial feature repetition effects in cueing tasks.
    Huffman G; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27743261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. May I have your attention please: Binding of attended but response-irrelevant features.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Koch I; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1143-1156. PubMed ID: 29520713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contextual cueing in co-active visual search: Joint action allows acquisition of task-irrelevant context.
    Zang X; Zinchenko A; Wu J; Zhu X; Fang F; Shi Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1114-1129. PubMed ID: 35437702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching.
    Dreisbach G; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1540-6. PubMed ID: 21707220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):935-51. PubMed ID: 21728467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():12-8. PubMed ID: 24486802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive Multitasking: Inhibition in Task Switching Depends on Stimulus Complexity.
    Schuch S; Bock O; Freitag K; Moretti L
    J Cogn; 2020 Sep; 3(1):30. PubMed ID: 33043240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency.
    Atalay NB; Inan AB
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):490-507. PubMed ID: 26908247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.