These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36113256)

  • 1. Visual working memory representations bias attention more when they are the target of an action plan.
    Trentin C; Slagter HA; Olivers CNL
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105274. PubMed ID: 36113256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
    Kerzel D; Andres MK
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual working memory modulates low-level saccade target selection: evidence from rapidly generated saccades in the global effect paradigm.
    Hollingworth A; Matsukura M; Luck SJ
    J Vis; 2013 Nov; 13(13):4. PubMed ID: 24190909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Zhang B; Liu S; Doro M; Galfano G
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13876. PubMed ID: 30224710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic interactions between visual working memory and saccade target selection.
    Schneegans S; Spencer JP; Schöner G; Hwang S; Hollingworth A
    J Vis; 2014 Sep; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 25228628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input.
    Gayet S; Guggenmos M; Christophel TB; Haynes JD; Paffen CLE; Van der Stigchel S; Sterzer P
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(28):6638-6647. PubMed ID: 28592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual working memory modulates within-object metrics of saccade landing position.
    Hollingworth A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 25684544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials Reveal Dynamic (Re)allocation of Spatial Attention during Maintenance and Utilization of Visual Working Memory.
    Chota S; Bruat AT; Van der Stigchel S; Strauch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; 36(5):800-814. PubMed ID: 38261370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations.
    Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):225-230. PubMed ID: 28134550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
    Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: Behavioral and computational evidence.
    Zhou C; Lorist MM; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2950-2962. PubMed ID: 32394070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.
    Hollingworth A; Matsukura M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1822-1835. PubMed ID: 30980343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention.
    Chen Y; Du F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6107. PubMed ID: 28733668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective visual processing across competition episodes: a theory of task-driven visual attention and working memory.
    Schneider WX
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 368(1628):20130060. PubMed ID: 24018722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.