These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36114015)

  • 1. A technique for measuring the clinical retentive forces of mandibular implant-supported overdentures.
    Raafat MH; ELsyad MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):310-314. PubMed ID: 36114015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anterior implant-supported overdentures.
    Ben-Ur Z; Gorfil C; Shifman A
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):603-6. PubMed ID: 9180417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.
    Sadig W
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Apr; 40(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 19417876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Implant Inclination on Retention and Peri-implant Stresses of Stud-Retained Implant Overdentures During Axial and Nonaxial Dislodgments: An In Vitro Study.
    Alameldeen HE; Elsyad MA; Shawky AF; Khirallah AS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):543-550. PubMed ID: 32406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces on the stability of 2-implant-retained mandibular overdenture.
    Liu W; Zhang X; Qing H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 31780109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Agha NN; Habib AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1040-8. PubMed ID: 27632258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preliminary in vivo trial of load transfer in mandibular implant-retained overdentures anchored in 2 different ways: allowing and counteracting free rotation.
    Menicucci G; Ceruti P; Barabino E; Screti A; Bignardi C; Preti G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):574-6. PubMed ID: 17165296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Elhaddad AA; Khirallah AS
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 27589487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part I.
    Warreth A; Alkadhimi AF; Sultan A; Byrne C; Woods E
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015; 61(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 26281708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: an in vitro study, part I.
    Arat Bilhan S; Bilhan H; Bozdag E; Sunbuloglu E; Baykasoglu C; Kutay O
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 23296030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-implant mandibular overdentures: simple to fabricate and easy to wear.
    Klemetti E; Chehade A; Takanashi Y; Feine JS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 12556267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations.
    Maniewicz S; Badoud I; Herrmann FR; Chebib N; Ammann P; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 31876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant-supported overdentures under biting force: An in-vitro study.
    Zhang X; Liu W; Qing H; Pei X; Chen J; Wang J
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 29989109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.