These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36114219)
1. Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions. Winter K; Menne NM; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15571. PubMed ID: 36114219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data. Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13379. PubMed ID: 35927288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model. Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the possible advantages of combining small lineups with instructions that discourage guessing-based selection. Therre A; Bell R; Menne NM; Mayer C; Lichtenhagen U; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14126. PubMed ID: 38898071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the impact of first-yes-counts instructions on eyewitness performance using the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model. Winter K; Menne NM; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6572. PubMed ID: 37085508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of lineup size on the processes underlying eyewitness decisions. Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17190. PubMed ID: 37821465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups. Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves. Yang Y; Smith AM Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology. Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups. Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data. Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):278-300. PubMed ID: 32700238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance. Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts. Colloff MF; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling face similarity in police lineups. Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance. McKinley GL; Peterson DJ Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Oct; 7(1):95. PubMed ID: 36271974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups. Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 36757968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects. Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]