These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36114570)
21. Promising results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a hexagonal, modular, tapered stem in cases of aseptic loosening. Schwarze J; Theil C; Gosheger G; Dieckmann R; Moellenbeck B; Ackmann T; Schmidt-Braekling T PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233035. PubMed ID: 32574168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up. Kang JS; Na Y; Ko BS; Jeon YS J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(3):2309499018812241. PubMed ID: 30449250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparable Cumulative Incidence of Late Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture and Aseptic Stem Loosening in Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Concise Follow-Up Report at a Minimum of 20 Years. Innmann MM; Streit MR; Bruckner T; Merle C; Gotterbarm T J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1144-1148. PubMed ID: 29246715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-Term Outcomes After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 28-mm Head: A 17- to 23-Year Follow-Up Study of a Previous Report. Moon JK; Kim Y; Hwang KT; Yang JH; Oh YH; Kim YH J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2165-2172. PubMed ID: 29656971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision]. Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement]. Kubinec V Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty. Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modern Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem. Wallace CN; Chang JS; Kayani B; Moriarty PD; Tahmassebi JE; Haddad FS J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3697-3702. PubMed ID: 32713726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Nocon AA; Sculco TP; Sculco PK; Bostrom MP Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 30415464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of a proximal femur fracture: Analysis of 59 cases of intra- and extra-capsular fractures. Morice A; Ducellier F; Bizot P; Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 104(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 29908356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prostheses are effective in treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A retrospective mid- to long-term follow-up study. Wang Q; Li D; Kang P J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019857653. PubMed ID: 31232172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of a long stem cemented femoral component in revision total hip replacement: a follow-up study of five to 16 years. Te Stroet MA; Bronsema E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1207-13. PubMed ID: 25183592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modern Proximal Femoral Replacement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Nononcologic Indications. Heckmann ND; Nakata HL; Chung BC; Baker JR; Longjohn DB; Christ AB; Oakes DA J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8S):S958-S963. PubMed ID: 35189288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Primary total hip replacement in Ficat-Arlet stage 3 and 4 osteonecrosis: a retrospective study at a minimum 12-year follow-up. Erivan R; Caputo T; Riouach H; Villatte G; Perreira B; Descamps S; Boisgard S Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jul; 30(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 32107641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision. Springer BD; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Nov; 85(11):2156-62. PubMed ID: 14630846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mid-Term Outcomes of Cemented or Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Failed Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Following Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study. Huang T; Zhang S; Liu X; Lv G; Huang H; Wang S; Zhao M; Xiong M; Yu W; Cheng Q; Huang T Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil; 2022; 13():21514593221132400. PubMed ID: 36238963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cementless total hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of subtrochanteric fracture. Jin SY; Jin JY; Kim MG; Kim WJ; Yoon TR; Park KS BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):384. PubMed ID: 33894763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of Gamma-irradiated proximal femoral allografts for bone stock reconstruction in complex revision hip arthroplasty. Nusem I; Morgan DA Hip Int; 2013; 23(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 23813172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The value of megaprostheses in non-oncological fractures in elderly patients: A short-term results. Vitiello R; Ziranu A; Oliva MS; Meluzio MC; Cauteruccio M; Maccauro G; Liuzza F; Saccomanno MF Injury; 2022 Mar; 53(3):1241-1246. PubMed ID: 34602244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]