These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36114739)

  • 1. Irrelevant sights and sounds require spatial suppression: ERP evidence.
    Lunn J; Berggren N; Ward J; Forster S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Mar; 60(3):e14181. PubMed ID: 36114739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces.
    Burra N; Coll SY; Barras C; Kerzel D
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():44-49. PubMed ID: 27899310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of multisensory distraction on working memory: A role for task relevance?
    Turoman N; Vergauwe E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38127491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proactive suppression can be applied to multiple salient distractors in visual search.
    Drisdelle BL; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2504-2519. PubMed ID: 37126051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endogenous attention modulates attentional and motor interference from distractors: evidence from behavioral and electrophysiological results.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Lupiáñez J; Botta F; Chica AB
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():132. PubMed ID: 25750629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nx4 Reduced Susceptibility to Distraction in an Attention Modulation Task.
    Mayer K; Krylova M; Alizadeh S; Jamalabadi H; van der Meer J; Vester JC; Naschold B; Schultz M; Walter M
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():746215. PubMed ID: 34912250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards understanding how we pay attention in naturalistic visual search settings.
    Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM; Matusz PJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 244():118556. PubMed ID: 34492292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological Evidence for the Suppression of Highly Salient Distractors.
    Stilwell BT; Egeth H; Gaspelin N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 34(5):787-805. PubMed ID: 35104346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P
    Drisdelle BL; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Sep; 58(9):e13878. PubMed ID: 34110022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamics of attentional allocation to targets and distractors during visual search.
    Forschack N; Gundlach C; Hillyard S; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2022 Dec; 264():119759. PubMed ID: 36417950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preserved Suppression of Salient Irrelevant Stimuli During Visual Search in Age-Associated Memory Impairment.
    Lorenzo-López L; Maseda A; Buján A; de Labra C; Amenedo E; Millán-Calenti JC
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2033. PubMed ID: 26793148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.
    Donohue SE; Todisco AE; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 25(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 23249355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional focusing and filtering in multisensory categorization.
    Li J; Deng SW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):708-720. PubMed ID: 37673842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search.
    Schmid RR; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):667-684. PubMed ID: 36460927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.
    Hakim N; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Jun; 31(7):3323-3337. PubMed ID: 33675357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.