These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36114988)

  • 1. The effect of vertebral body tethering on spine range of motion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study.
    Maksimovic M; Beaudette SM; Livock H; Tice A; Jarvis J; Smit K; Graham RB
    Spine Deform; 2023 Jan; 11(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 36114988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertebral body tethering compared to posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: preliminary results from a matched case-control study.
    Mathew SE; Hargiss JB; Milbrandt TA; Stans AA; Shaughnessy WJ; Larson AN
    Spine Deform; 2022 Sep; 10(5):1123-1131. PubMed ID: 35610543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces motion of the spine and influences coupled motion: a finite element analysis.
    Nicolini LF; Oliveira RC; Ribeiro M; Stoffel M; Markert B; Kobbe P; Hildebrand F; Trobisch P; Simões MS; de Mello Roesler CR; Fancello EA
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Feb; 169():107851. PubMed ID: 38113683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Could have tethered: predicting the proportion of scoliosis patients most appropriate for thoracic anterior spinal tethering.
    Krakow AR; Magee LC; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM
    Spine Deform; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 33534123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can anterior vertebral body tethering provide superior range of motion outcomes compared to posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review.
    Wong DLL; Mong PT; Ng CY; Ong CK; Qian Z; Shao MH; Sin LKE; Wong BY; Wong CM; Cheung JPY; To M
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Sep; 32(9):3058-3071. PubMed ID: 37256367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results.
    Pehlivanoglu T; Oltulu I; Erdag Y; Akturk UD; Korkmaz E; Yildirim E; Sarioglu E; Ofluoglu E; Aydogan M
    Spine Deform; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 33683642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?
    Lonner B; Eaker L; Hoernschemeyer D; Zhang J; Wilczek A; Elliot P; Boeyer ME; Fletcher ND; Alanay A; Yilgor C; Newton P; Miyanji F;
    Spine Deform; 2024 May; 12(3):651-662. PubMed ID: 38285163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.
    Zhang H; Fan Y; Ni S; Pi G
    Spine Deform; 2022 Nov; 10(6):1233-1243. PubMed ID: 35841473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operative differences for posterior spinal fusion after vertebral body tethering: Are we fusing more levels in the end?
    Boeyer ME; Groneck A; Alanay A; Neal KM; Larson AN; Parent S; Newton P; Miyanji F; Haber L; ; Hoernschemeyer DG
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Feb; 32(2):625-633. PubMed ID: 36542164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior vertebral body tethering shows clinically comparable shoulder balance outcomes to posterior spinal fusion.
    Meyers J; Eaker L; Samdani A; Miyanji F; Herrera M; Wilczek A; Alanay A; Yilgor C; Hoernschemeyer D; Shah S; Newton P; Lonner B
    Spine Deform; 2024 Jul; 12(4):1033-1042. PubMed ID: 38517667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion preservation surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study.
    Nicolini LF; Kobbe P; Seggewiß J; Greven J; Ribeiro M; Beckmann A; Da Paz S; Eschweiler J; Prescher A; Markert B; Stoffel M; Hildebrand F; Trobisch PD
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Apr; 31(4):1013-1021. PubMed ID: 34716821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurable Lumbar Motion Remains 1 Year After Vertebral Body Tethering.
    Mathew SE; Milbrandt TA; Larson AN
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 Sep; 42(8):e861-e867. PubMed ID: 35878415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of three-dimensional spine growth for vertebral body tethering patients at 2 and 5 years post operatively.
    Boulet M; Hurry J; Skaggs D; Welborn MC; Andras L; Louer C; Larson AN; Miyanji F; Parent S; ; El-Hawary R
    Spine Deform; 2024 Jul; 12(4):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 38568378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global Spine Range of Motion in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Before and After Corrective Surgery.
    Mehkri Y; Hernandez J; McQuerry JL; Carmona J; Ihnow S
    Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19362. PubMed ID: 34909319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGR) Versus Single Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) Versus Vertebral Body Tether (VBT) in Older Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Patients: How Do Early Outcomes Compare?
    Mackey C; Hanstein R; Lo Y; Vaughan M; St Hilaire T; Luhmann SJ; Vitale MG; Glotzbecker MP; Samdani A; Parent S; Gomez JA;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Feb; 47(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 34610613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trunk Range of Motion and Patient Outcomes After Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion: Comparison Using Computerized 3D Motion Capture Technology.
    Pahys JM; Samdani AF; Hwang SW; Warshauer S; Gaughan JP; Chafetz RS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Sep; 104(17):1563-1572. PubMed ID: 35766407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. To tether or fuse? Significant equipoise remains in treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis.
    Shaw KA; Welborn MC; Matsumoto H; Parent S; Sachwani N; El-Hawary R; Skaggs D; Newton PO; Blakemore L; Vitale M; Samdani A; Murphy JS;
    Spine Deform; 2022 Jul; 10(4):763-773. PubMed ID: 35316524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-sided vertebral body tethering of double adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves: radiographic outcomes of the first 13 patients with 2 years of follow-up.
    Pehlivanoglu T; Oltulu I; Erdag Y; Korkmaz E; Sarioglu E; Ofluoglu E; Aydogan M
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1896-1904. PubMed ID: 33611658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A New Look at Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT): Through the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink (mCDS) Classification.
    Vorhies JS; Hauth L; Garcia S; Roye BD; Poon S; Sturm PF; Glotzbecker M; Fletcher ND; Stone JD; Cahill PJ; Anari JB;
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2024 May-Jun 01; 44(5):e389-e393. PubMed ID: 38454491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective comparison of gait and trunk range of motion in adolescents with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis undergoing anterior or posterior spinal fusion.
    Engsberg JR; Lenke LG; Uhrich ML; Ross SA; Bridwell KH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(17):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 12973147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.