These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36115778)

  • 1. Risk factors for lower border notching after bilateral mandibular sagittal ramus advancement: three-dimensional evaluation.
    Masson A; Veyssiere A; Briant A; Weill P; Preud'homme R; Benateau H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 May; 52(5):577-583. PubMed ID: 36115778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to Prevent Mandibular Lower Border Notching After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies for Major Advancements: Analysis of 168 Osteotomies.
    Raffaini M; Magri AS; Giuntini V; Nieri M; Pantani C; Conti M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 78(9):1620-1626. PubMed ID: 32479810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D analysis of condylar remodelling and skeletal relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
    Xi T; Schreurs R; van Loon B; de Koning M; Bergé S; Hoppenreijs T; Maal T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 25779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upper Airway Changes After Mandibular Setback and/or Advancement Genioplasty in Obese Patients.
    Du W; He D; Wang Y; Liu H; Liao C; Fei W; Luo E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 75(10):2202-2210. PubMed ID: 28500875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Bone Grafts or Modified Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Technique in Large Mandibular Advancements Reduces the Risk of Persisting Mandibular Inferior Border Defects.
    Cifuentes J; Yanine N; Jerez D; Barrera A; Agbaje JO; Politis C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 76(1):189.e1-189.e6. PubMed ID: 28963868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of pharyngeal airway changes on plain radiography and cone-beam computed tomography after orthognathic surgery.
    Sears CR; Miller AJ; Chang MK; Huang JC; Lee JS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):e385-94. PubMed ID: 21778015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for the development of lower border defects after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Agbaje JO; Sun Y; Vrielinck L; Schepers S; Lambrichts I; Politis C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):588-96. PubMed ID: 23010370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are there risk factors for osseous mandibular inferior border defects after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy?
    Verweij JP; van Rijssel JG; Fiocco M; Mensink G; Gooris PJ; van Merkesteyn JP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 28065728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies during adolescence.
    den Besten CA; Mensink G; van Merkesteyn JP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):e78-82. PubMed ID: 23253633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
    Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in Condylar Position Within 12 Months After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With and Without Le Fort I Osteotomy by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Han Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 80(1):162-173. PubMed ID: 34547267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Lingual Splitting Patterns and the Lateral Bone Cut Ends Following Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
    Khaleel AA; Bede SY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):e728-e731. PubMed ID: 37316983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in natural head position in response to mandibular advancement.
    Lin X; Edwards SP
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 55(5):471-475. PubMed ID: 28256278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of bone contact area and intercondylar distance changes in orthognathic surgery - a comparison between BSSO and HSSO technique depending on mandibular displacement extent.
    Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Peters F; Heitzer M; Szalma J; Prescher A; Danesh G; Hölzle F; Modabber A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(3):182. PubMed ID: 38424318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the mandibular split patterns in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Hou M; Yu TP; Wang JG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 73(5):985-93. PubMed ID: 25883003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on multi-slice and cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the mandibular canal during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
    Freire-Maia B; Machado VD; Valerio CS; Custódio AL; Manzi FR; Junqueira JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 46(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 27939592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness in mandibular prognathic patients with neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Huang CS; Syu JJ; Ko EW; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 71(12):2153.e1-10. PubMed ID: 24135253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibula performed with separators: a multi-centre prospective study.
    Mensink G; Zweers A; Wolterbeek R; Dicker GG; Groot RH; van Merkesteyn RJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 22440316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement with and without advancement genioplasty.
    van der Linden C; van der Linden WJ; Reyneke JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 25592706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.