These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36116393)

  • 1. Synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) or dinoprostone vaginal inserts (Propess) for inpatient induction of labour: A UK cost-consequence model.
    Walker KF; Zaher S; Torrejon Torres R; Saunders SJ; Saunders R; Gupta JK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Nov; 278():72-76. PubMed ID: 36116393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised open-label trial to assess outpatient induction of labour (HOMEIND) and compare efficacy of Propess vs Dilapan-S® for induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation in normal risk nulliparous women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Nicholson SM; Smith O; Hatt S; Molphy Z; Dicker P; Flood K; Malone F
    Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):135. PubMed ID: 36814336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moving preinduction cervical ripening to a lower acuity inpatient setting using the synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator: a cost-consequence analysis for the United States.
    Saunders SJ; Grisamore JL; Wong T; Torrejon Torres R; Saunders R; Einerson B
    J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):1185-1198. PubMed ID: 36274625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
    Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective pilot study of Dilapan-S compared with Propess for induction of labour at 41+ weeks in nulliparous pregnancy.
    Crosby DA; O'Reilly C; McHale H; McAuliffe FM; Mahony R
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Aug; 187(3):693-699. PubMed ID: 29270855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Gupta JK; Maher A; Stubbs C; Brocklehurst P; Daniels JP; Hardy P;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jul; 4(4):100628. PubMed ID: 35358740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study.
    Gupta J; Chodankar R; Baev O; Bahlmann F; Brega E; Gala A; Hellmeyer L; Hruban L; Maier J; Mehta P; Murthy A; Ritter M; Saad A; Shmakov R; Suneja A; Zahumensky J; Gdovinova D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Oct; 229():70-75. PubMed ID: 30107363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2.
    Koenigbauer JT; Schalinski E; Jarchau U; Gauger U; Brandt K; Klaucke S; Scharf JP; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 34333894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial.
    Kalkat RK; McMillan E; Cooper H; Palmer K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 19065363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of vaginal delivery after cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator.
    Saad AF; Gupta J; Hruban L; Hankins GD; Saade GR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():160-164. PubMed ID: 32028144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preinduction cervical ripening: prostaglandin E2 gel vs hygroscopic mechanical dilator.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Vanaja K; Ratnam SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Apr; 23(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 9158305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
    Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
    Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    Jozwiak M; Bloemenkamp KW; Kelly AJ; Mol BW; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 22419277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between labor induction with only Dilapan-S and a combination of mifepristone and Dilapan-S in nulliparous women: a prospective pilot study.
    Baev OR; Babich DA; Prikhodko AM; Tysyachniy OV; Sukhikh GT
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(17):2832-2837. PubMed ID: 31570028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labor using prostaglandin vaginal gel: cost analysis comparing early amniotomy with repeat prostaglandin gel.
    Beckmann M; Merollini K; Kumar S; Flenady V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():96-101. PubMed ID: 26914400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of perinatal outcomes between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and metreurynter for cervical ripening in labor induction: A retrospective single-center study in Japan.
    Yamaguchi M; Takakura S; Enomoto N; Teishikata Y; Kitamura A; Maki S; Tanaka K; Maezawa T; Tanaka H; Ikeda T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Dec; 47(12):4256-4262. PubMed ID: 34545652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is induction of labour by Propess(®) safe? A comparison of midwife-led versus obstetrician-led labour management.
    Bayoglu Tekin Y; Mete Ural U; Kerimoglu OS; Balik G; Kir Sahin F; Guvendag Guven ES
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 May; 35(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 25279771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.
    Henry A; Madan A; Reid R; Tracy SK; Austin K; Welsh A; Challis D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():25. PubMed ID: 23356673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Propess outcomes for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy.
    Chen W; Zhou Y; Pu X; Xiao C
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 34(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 24313636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
    PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.