197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36117165)
1. Oncological outcomes of anatomic versus non-anatomic resections for small hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.
Dai XM; Xiang ZQ; Wang Q; Li HJ; Zhu Z
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 36117165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Moris D; Tsilimigras DI; Kostakis ID; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I; Shah KN; Felekouras E; Pawlik TM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):927-938. PubMed ID: 29751946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of anatomic and non-anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Kaibori M; Kon M; Kitawaki T; Kawaura T; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Ariizumi S; Beppu T; Ishizu H; Kubo S; Kamiyama T; Takamura H; Kobayashi T; Kim DS; Wang HJ; Kim JM; Han DH; Park SJ; Kang KJ; Hwang S; Roh Y; You YK; Joh JW; Yamamoto M
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2017 Nov; 24(11):616-626. PubMed ID: 28887834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without macroscopic vascular invasion: A propensity score matching analysis.
Zhao H; Chen C; Gu S; Yan X; Jia W; Mao L; Qiu Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Apr; 32(4):870-878. PubMed ID: 27671209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and safety of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.
Tan Y; Zhang W; Jiang L; Yang J; Yan L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186930. PubMed ID: 29073257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of anatomic and non-anatomic resections for very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: The importance of surgical resection margin width in non-anatomic resection.
Su CM; Chou CC; Yang TH; Lin YJ
Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 36():15-22. PubMed ID: 33276259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive meta-regression analysis on outcome of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Cucchetti A; Cescon M; Ercolani G; Bigonzi E; Torzilli G; Pinna AD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3697-705. PubMed ID: 22722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhou Y; Xu D; Wu L; Li B
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2011 Oct; 396(7):1109-17. PubMed ID: 21476060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, do we have an answer? A meta-analysis.
Jiao S; Li G; Zhang D; Xu Y; Liu J; Li G
Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():243-255. PubMed ID: 32413500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Meta-analysis comparing the effect of anatomical resection vs. non-anatomical resection on the long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Huang X; Lu S
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Oct; 19(10):843-849. PubMed ID: 28739076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prognostic Impact Assessed from Recurrence Treatment.
Minagawa M; Mise Y; Omichi K; Ichida H; Mizuno T; Yoshioka R; Imamura H; Yanagisawa N; Inoue Y; Takahashi Y; Saiura A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):913-921. PubMed ID: 34549363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sun Z; Li Z; Shi XL; He XW; Chen J; Song JH
Asian J Surg; 2021 Sep; 44(9):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 33766529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic versus nonanatomic hepatectomy for a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma : a case-controlled study with propensity score matching.
Okamura Y; Ito T; Sugiura T; Mori K; Uesaka K
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Nov; 18(11):1994-2002. PubMed ID: 25213582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.
Ke Q; Wang L; Lin Z; Liu H; Lou J; Zheng S; Bi X; Wang J; Guo W; Li F; Wang J; Zheng Y; Li J; Cheng S; Zhou W; Liu J; Zeng Y
BMC Cancer; 2023 Sep; 23(1):850. PubMed ID: 37697239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-Term Outcomes of Anatomic Versus Nonanatomic Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Wu JY; Sun JX; Bai YN; Huang XX; Wu JY; Wei YG; Zhang ZB; Zhou JY; Wang YD; Cheng SQ; Yan ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7686-7695. PubMed ID: 33929619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma.
Cucchetti A; Qiao GL; Cescon M; Li J; Xia Y; Ercolani G; Shen F; Pinna AD
Surgery; 2014 Mar; 155(3):512-21. PubMed ID: 24439747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of survival between anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: significance of surgical margin in non-anatomic resection.
Nanashima A; Sumida Y; Abo T; Nagasaki T; Tobinaga S; Fukuoka H; Takeshita H; Hidaka S; Tanaka K; Sawai T; Yasutake T; Nagayasu T
Acta Chir Belg; 2008; 108(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 19051461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shin SW; Kim TS; Ahn KS; Kim YH; Kang KJ
Int J Surg; 2023 Sep; 109(9):2784-2793. PubMed ID: 37247010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomical versus non-anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria.
Li SQ; Huang T; Shen SL; Hua YP; Hu WJ; Kuang M; Peng BG; Liang LJ
Br J Surg; 2017 Jan; 104(1):118-127. PubMed ID: 27696379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recurrence after anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Ye JZ; Miao ZG; Wu FX; Zhao YN; Ye HH; Li LQ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(5):1771-7. PubMed ID: 22901120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
