173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36117168)
1. A two-phase approach to re-calibrating expensive computer simulation for sex-specific colorectal neoplasia development modeling.
Vivas-Valencia C; Zhou Y; Sai A; Imperiale TF; Kong N
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36117168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.
Sai A; Vivas-Valencia C; Imperiale TF; Kong N
Med Decis Making; 2019 Jul; 39(5):540-552. PubMed ID: 31375053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Calibration of disease simulation model using an engineering approach.
Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gazelle GS
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):521-9. PubMed ID: 19900254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration of parameters in Dynamic Energy Budget models using Direct-Search methods.
Morais JV; Custódio AL; Marques GM
J Math Biol; 2019 Apr; 78(5):1439-1458. PubMed ID: 30523383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CMOST: an open-source framework for the microsimulation of colorectal cancer screening strategies.
Prakash MK; Lang B; Heinrich H; Valli PV; Bauerfeind P; Sonnenberg A; Beerenwinkel N; Misselwitz B
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jun; 17(1):80. PubMed ID: 28583127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling.
Jalal H; Trikalinos TA; Alarid-Escudero F
Front Physiol; 2021; 12():662314. PubMed ID: 34113262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibrating Parameters for Microsimulation Disease Models: A Review and Comparison of Different Goodness-of-Fit Criteria.
van der Steen A; van Rosmalen J; Kroep S; van Hees F; Steyerberg EW; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
Med Decis Making; 2016 Jul; 36(5):652-65. PubMed ID: 26957567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequentially calibrating a Bayesian microsimulation model to incorporate new information and assumptions.
DeYoreo M; Rutter CM; Ozik J; Collier N
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35022005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stochastic approach to data analysis in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
Rao R; Langoju R; Gösch M; Rigler P; Serov A; Lasser T
J Phys Chem A; 2006 Sep; 110(37):10674-82. PubMed ID: 16970356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re-calibrating pure risk integrating individual data from two-phase studies with external summary statistics.
Zheng J; Zheng Y; Hsu L
Biometrics; 2022 Dec; 78(4):1515-1529. PubMed ID: 34390251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a comparison of alternative measures of goodness of fit, parameter search strategies and convergence criteria.
Karnon J; Vanni T
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jan; 29(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 21142278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Calibration of a Dynamic HIV Transmission Model for 6 US Cities.
Zang X; Krebs E; Min JE; Pandya A; Marshall BDL; Schackman BR; Behrends CN; Feaster DJ; Nosyk B;
Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 31865849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian Calibration of Microsimulation Models.
Rutter CM; Miglioretti DL; Savarino JE
J Am Stat Assoc; 2009 Dec; 104(488):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 20076767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A monolithic 3D-0D coupled closed-loop model of the heart and the vascular system: Experiment-based parameter estimation for patient-specific cardiac mechanics.
Hirschvogel M; Bassilious M; Jagschies L; Wildhirt SM; Gee MW
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Aug; 33(8):e2842. PubMed ID: 27743468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parameterizing sorption isotherms using a hybrid global-local fitting procedure.
Matott LS; Singh A; Rabideau AJ
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 May; 200():35-48. PubMed ID: 28372853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Constructing robust and efficient experimental designs in groundwater modeling using a Galerkin method, proper orthogonal decomposition, and metaheuristic algorithms.
Ushijima TT; Yeh WWG; Wong WK
PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0254620. PubMed ID: 34351931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling and Simulation of Additively Manufactured Cylindrical Component Using Combined Thermomechanical and Inherent Strain Method with Nelder-Mead Optimization.
Taufek T; Manurung YHP; Adenan MS; Akma S; Choo HL; Louhichi B; Bednardz M; Aziz I
3D Print Addit Manuf; 2023 Feb; 10(1):156-169. PubMed ID: 36998800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonidentifiability in Model Calibration and Implications for Medical Decision Making.
Alarid-Escudero F; MacLehose RF; Peralta Y; Kuntz KM; Enns EA
Med Decis Making; 2018 Oct; 38(7):810-821. PubMed ID: 30248276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Weighted Stochastic Simulation Methods for the Analysis of Genetic Circuits.
Ahmadi M; Thomas PJ; Buecherl L; Winstead C; Myers CJ; Zheng H
ACS Synth Biol; 2023 Jan; 12(1):287-304. PubMed ID: 36583529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
