These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36117168)

  • 21. A Comparison of Weighted Stochastic Simulation Methods for the Analysis of Genetic Circuits.
    Ahmadi M; Thomas PJ; Buecherl L; Winstead C; Myers CJ; Zheng H
    ACS Synth Biol; 2023 Jan; 12(1):287-304. PubMed ID: 36583529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Calibrating predictive model estimates in a distributed network of patient data.
    Huang Y; Jiang X; Gabriel RA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 May; 117():103758. PubMed ID: 33811986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A simulation model of colorectal cancer surveillance and recurrence.
    Rose J; Augestad KM; Kong CY; Meropol NJ; Kattan MW; Hong Q; An X; Cooper GS
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Apr; 14():29. PubMed ID: 24708517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections.
    Cunto F; Saccomanno FF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1171-9. PubMed ID: 18460386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An improved hybrid of particle swarm optimization and the gravitational search algorithm to produce a kinetic parameter estimation of aspartate biochemical pathways.
    Ismail AM; Mohamad MS; Abdul Majid H; Abas KH; Deris S; Zaki N; Mohd Hashim SZ; Ibrahim Z; Remli MA
    Biosystems; 2017 Dec; 162():81-89. PubMed ID: 28951204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.
    Stout NK; Knudsen AB; Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gazelle GS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(7):533-45. PubMed ID: 19663525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using Active Learning for Speeding up Calibration in Simulation Models.
    Cevik M; Ergun MA; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; Craven M; Alagoz O
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Jul; 36(5):581-93. PubMed ID: 26471190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new methodology based on sensitivity analysis to simplify the recalibration of functional-structural plant models in new conditions.
    Mathieu A; Vidal T; Jullien A; Wu Q; Chambon C; Bayol B; Cournède PH
    Ann Bot; 2018 Aug; 122(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 29924295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian calibration of a natural history model with application to a population model for colorectal cancer.
    Whyte S; Walsh C; Chilcott J
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 21127321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling the error of continuous glucose monitoring sensor data: critical aspects discussed through simulation studies.
    Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 4(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 20167162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Calibration of individual-based models to epidemiological data: A systematic review.
    Hazelbag CM; Dushoff J; Dominic EM; Mthombothi ZE; Delva W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e1007893. PubMed ID: 32392252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing Single-Objective Optimization Protocols for Calibrating the Birds Nest Aquifer Model-A Problem Having Multiple Local Optima.
    Lyons RT; Peralta RC; Majumder P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32019060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the accuracy and computational cost of spiking neuron implementation.
    Valadez-Godínez S; Sossa H; Santiago-Montero R
    Neural Netw; 2020 Feb; 122():196-217. PubMed ID: 31689679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of a simulated annealing algorithm to fit compartmental models with an application to fractal pharmacokinetics.
    Marsh RE; Riauka TA; McQuarrie SA
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2007; 10(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 17706176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accelerated maximum likelihood parameter estimation for stochastic biochemical systems.
    Daigle BJ; Roh MK; Petzold LR; Niemi J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 13():68. PubMed ID: 22548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evolving a Nelder-Mead Algorithm for Optimization with Genetic Programming.
    Fajfar I; Puhan J; Bűrmen Á
    Evol Comput; 2017; 25(3):351-373. PubMed ID: 26807484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting colorectal cancer risk from adenoma detection via a two-type branching process model.
    Lang BM; Kuipers J; Misselwitz B; Beerenwinkel N
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Feb; 16(2):e1007552. PubMed ID: 32023238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stochastic parameter search for events.
    Roh MK; Eckhoff P
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014 Nov; 8():126. PubMed ID: 25380984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.